Literature DB >> 15034773

Simultaneous measurement of intramuscular pressure and surface electromyography of the multifidus muscle.

Michael Kramer1, Hans-Ullrich Völker, Eva Weikert, Peter Katzmaier, Jürgen Sterk, Christian Willy, Heinz Gerngross, Lothar Kinzl, Erich Hartwig.   

Abstract

The anatomic proof of a spinal compartment and the clinical symptoms of compartment syndrome in patients with chronic back pain are inconsistent with the rarely met measuring criteria of intramuscular pressure (IMP). Previous studies assume a dependence of the IMP on spinal alignment (degree of lumbar spine flexion) and the degree of muscle activation. The significance of these disturbance variables in the interpretation of IMP could explain the above discrepancy. This study therefore investigates the influence of both a 30% increase in trunk flexion and alterations in muscle contraction from 100% to 60%. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in the study. The IMP and mean rectified amplitude of the multifidus surface EMG signal were determined at rest and 0 degrees and approximately 30 degrees of lumbar spine flexion, and they were compared. Subsequently, both parameters were measured during both 100% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the muscle and then correlated. During rest and 0 degrees flexion, the median IMP was 9.3 mmHg (range 0.0-22.5) while the median mean rectified amplitude (MRA) of the EMG signal was 1.98 microV (range 1.32-7.38). In 30 degrees flexion, the median IMP went up to 24.3 mmHg (range 1.4-97.3) with hardly any increase in the median MRA of 2.32 microV (range 1.20-9.72). Under 60% MVC, the median IMP rose to 186.6 mmHg (range 15.4-375.4) and the median MRA to 21.02 microV (range 4.63-43.63). During 100% MVC, the median MRA increased to 34.38 microV (range 12.99-102.54) while the median IMP rose to 273.4 mmHg (range 90.4-395.1). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the IMP and MRA quotients of the 100/60% MVC values was r= -0.21. To sum up, it can be said that IMP was subject to great interindividual variation in all the experiments. This parameter is highly dependent on spinal alignment and muscular activity. Further studies are needed so that the IMP can be interpreted properly when diagnosing a chronic compartment of the erector spinae muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034773      PMCID: PMC3476598          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0617-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Measurement of intracompartmental pressure with use of a new electronic transducer-tipped catheter system.

Authors:  C Willy; H Gerngross; J Sterk
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Chronic compartment syndrome in the erector spinae muscle.

Authors:  J Styf; E Lysell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting. IV. The causal factors of the intra-abdominal pressure rise.

Authors:  B Hemborg; U Moritz; H Löwing
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1985

4.  Reliability of lumbar paravertebral EMG assessment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  D K Ahern; M J Follick; J R Council; N Laser-Wolston
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Pressure in the erector spinae muscle during exercise.

Authors:  J Styf
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Microcapillary infusion technique for measurement of intramuscular pressure during exercise.

Authors:  J R Styf; L M Körner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Blood flow in the calf muscle of man during heavy rhythmic exercise.

Authors:  B Folkow; U Haglund; M Jodal; O Lundgren
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1971-02

8.  Intramuscular fluid pressure during isometric contraction of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  O M Sejersted; A R Hargens; K R Kardel; P Blom; O Jensen; L Hermansen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-02

9.  Lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome. A case report with physiologic and anatomic studies.

Authors:  D Carr; L Gilbertson; J Frymoyer; M Krag; M Pope
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Are there compartment syndromes in some patients with idiopathic back pain?

Authors:  D Peck; P J Nicholls; C Beard; J R Allen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Posture-related stiffness mapping of paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  Maud Creze; Dina Bedretdinova; Marc Soubeyrand; Laurence Rocher; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Olivier Gagey; Xavier Maître; Marie-France Bellin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The paraspinal muscle-tendon system: Its paradoxical anatomy.

Authors:  Maud Creze; Marc Soubeyrand; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.