Literature DB >> 15033875

Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes.

David R Bickel1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Many methods of identifying differential expression in genes depend on testing the null hypotheses of exactly equal means or distributions of expression levels for each gene across groups, even though a statistically significant difference in the expression level does not imply the occurrence of any difference of biological or clinical significance. This is because a mathematical definition of 'differential expression' as any non-zero difference does not correspond to the differential expression biologists seek. Furthermore, while some current methods account for multiple comparisons in hypothesis tests, they do not accordingly adjust estimates of the degrees to which genes are differentially expressed. Both problems lead to overstating the relevance of findings.
RESULTS: Testing whether genes have relevant differential expression can be accomplished with customized null hypotheses, thereby redefining 'differential expression' in a way that is more biologically meaningful. When such tests control the false discovery rate, they effectively discover genes based on a desired quantile of differential gene expression. Estimation of the degree to which genes are differentially expressed has been corrected for multiple comparisons. AVAILABILITY: R code is freely available from http://www.davidbickel.com and may become available from www.r-project.org or www.bioconductor.org SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applications to cancer microarrays, an application in the absence of differential expression, pseudocode, and a guide to customizing the methods may be found at www.davidbickel.com and www.mathpreprints.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15033875     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  5 in total

1.  Optimized ranking and selection methods for feature selection with application in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Xinping Cui; Haibing Zhao; Jason Wilson
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Gene network reconstruction from transcriptional dynamics under kinetic model uncertainty: a case for the second derivative.

Authors:  David R Bickel; Zahra Montazeri; Pei-Chun Hsieh; Mary Beatty; Shai J Lawit; Nicholas J Bate
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  In silico Analyses of Skin and Peripheral Blood Transcriptional Data in Cutaneous Lupus Reveals CCR2-A Novel Potential Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Rama Dey-Rao; Animesh A Sinha
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  A white-box approach to microarray probe response characterization: the BaFL pipeline.

Authors:  Kevin J Thompson; Hrishikesh Deshmukh; Jeffrey L Solka; Jennifer W Weller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Validation of differential gene expression algorithms: application comparing fold-change estimation to hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Corey M Yanofsky; David R Bickel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.