PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in a novel self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for improved oral administration with or without P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors. METHODS: Paclitaxel SMEDDS formulation was optimized, in terms of droplet size and lack of drug precipitation following aqueous dilution, using a ternary phase diagram. Physicochemical properties of paclitaxel SMEDDS and its resulting microemulsions were evaluated. The plasma concentrations of paclitaxel were determined using a HPLC method following paclitaxel microemulsion administrations at various doses in rats. RESULTS: Following 1:10 aqueous dilution of optimal paclitaxel SMEDDS, the droplet size of resulting microemulsions was 2.0 +/- 0.4 nm, and the zeta potential was -45.5 +/- 0.5 mV. Compared to Taxol, the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel SMEDDS increased by 28.6% to 52.7% at various doses. There was a significant improvement in area under the curve (AUC) and time above therapeutic level (0.1 microM) of paclitaxel SMEDDS as compared to those of Taxol following coadministration of both formulations with 40 mg cyclosporin A (CsA)/kg. The oral absorption of paclitaxel SMEDDS slightly enhanced following coadministration of tacrolimus and etoposide, but plasma drug concentrations did not reach the therapeutic level. The nonlinear pharmacokinetic trend was not modified after paclitaxel was formulated in SMEDDS. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that SMEDDS is a promising novel formulation to enhance the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel, especially when coadministered with a suitable P-gp inhibitor, such as CsA.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in a novel self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) for improved oral administration with or without P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors. METHODS:Paclitaxel SMEDDS formulation was optimized, in terms of droplet size and lack of drug precipitation following aqueous dilution, using a ternary phase diagram. Physicochemical properties of paclitaxel SMEDDS and its resulting microemulsions were evaluated. The plasma concentrations of paclitaxel were determined using a HPLC method following paclitaxel microemulsion administrations at various doses in rats. RESULTS: Following 1:10 aqueous dilution of optimal paclitaxel SMEDDS, the droplet size of resulting microemulsions was 2.0 +/- 0.4 nm, and the zeta potential was -45.5 +/- 0.5 mV. Compared to Taxol, the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel SMEDDS increased by 28.6% to 52.7% at various doses. There was a significant improvement in area under the curve (AUC) and time above therapeutic level (0.1 microM) of paclitaxel SMEDDS as compared to those of Taxol following coadministration of both formulations with 40 mg cyclosporin A (CsA)/kg. The oral absorption of paclitaxel SMEDDS slightly enhanced following coadministration of tacrolimus and etoposide, but plasma drug concentrations did not reach the therapeutic level. The nonlinear pharmacokinetic trend was not modified after paclitaxel was formulated in SMEDDS. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that SMEDDS is a promising novel formulation to enhance the oral bioavailability of paclitaxel, especially when coadministered with a suitable P-gp inhibitor, such as CsA.
Authors: M M Malingré; J M Terwogt; J H Beijnen; H Rosing; F J Koopman; O van Tellingen; K Duchin; W W Huinink; M Swart; J Lieverst; J H Schellens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J M Meerum Terwogt; M M Malingré; J H Beijnen; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; H Rosing; F J Koopman; O van Tellingen; M Swart; J H Schellens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C M F Kruijtzer; J H M Schellens; J Mezger; M E Scheulen; U Keilholz; J H Beijnen; H Rosing; R A A Mathôt; S Marcus; H van Tinteren; P Baas Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T Tamura; T Fujita; Y Itoh; S Sugimoto; H Yamada; M Murakami; A Yamamoto; S Muranishi Journal: Biol Pharm Bull Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 2.233
Authors: J van Asperen; O van Tellingen; A Sparreboom; A H Schinkel; P Borst; W J Nooijen; J H Beijnen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1997 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yi-Ling Hsieh; Grace A Ilevbare; Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh; Karl J Box; Manuel Vincente Sanchez-Felix; Lynne S Taylor Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 4.200