Literature DB >> 15031791

Comparison of systemic and mucosal delivery of 2 canarypox virus vaccines expressing either HIV-1 genes or the gene for rabies virus G protein.

Peter F Wright1, Jiri Mestecky, M Juliana McElrath, Michael C Keefer, Geoffrey J Gorse, Paul A Goepfert, Zina Moldoveanu, David Schwartz, Paul W Spearman, Raphaelle El Habib, Michele D Spring, Yuwei Zhu, Carol Smith, Jorge Flores, Kent J Weinhold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the primary routes of human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) infection are across mucosal barriers, a randomized trial of canarypox virus-based vectors was conducted in 84 individuals, with delivery of vaccine by mucosal routes, and was accompanied by a detailed analysis of humoral, cellular, and mucosal immune responses.
METHODS: Over the course of 6 months, HIV-1-specific (vCP 205) and rabies (vCP 65) canarypox virus vectors were delivered systemically and/or mucosally into the nose, mouth, vagina, or rectum in a 4-dose schedule, followed by 2 doses of HIV-1 MN recombinant glycoprotein (rgp) 120 or subunit rabies vaccine administered by the intramuscular route.
RESULTS: Administration of vaccine and collection of samples were well tolerated. Serum IgG HIV-1-specific antibodies to rgp120 were rarely seen after either systemic or mucosal delivery of canarypox virus vaccine. In contrast, serum IgG rabies and canarypox antibodies were detected in all individuals after systemic, but rarely after mucosal, delivery of vaccine. Suggestions of mucosal recognition of HIV-1 antigen included a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in 4 of 8 individuals after administration of vaccine by the intrarectal route and a limited immunoglobulin A response at the same site.
CONCLUSIONS: Each of the routes of vaccine administration was feasible in the context of a phase 1 study with motivated individuals. However, with the doses and routes of administration used, canarypox virus was not an effective mucosal immunogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15031791     DOI: 10.1086/382088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  20 in total

1.  Immune-based approaches to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: active and passive immunization.

Authors:  Barb Lohman-Payne; Jennifer Slyker; Sarah L Rowland-Jones
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  Phase 2 study of an HIV-1 canarypox vaccine (vCP1452) alone and in combination with rgp120: negative results fail to trigger a phase 3 correlates trial.

Authors:  Nina D Russell; Barney S Graham; Michael C Keefer; M Juliana McElrath; Steve G Self; Kent J Weinhold; David C Montefiori; Guido Ferrari; Helen Horton; Georgia D Tomaras; Sanjay Gurunathan; Lynn Baglyos; Sharon E Frey; Mark J Mulligan; Clayton D Harro; Susan P Buchbinder; Lindsey R Baden; William A Blattner; Beryl A Koblin; Lawrence Corey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 3.  How can HIV-type-1-Env immunogenicity be improved to facilitate antibody-based vaccine development?

Authors:  Per Johan Klasse; Rogier W Sanders; Andrea Cerutti; John P Moore
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.205

Review 4.  Env Exceptionalism: Why Are HIV-1 Env Glycoproteins Atypical Immunogens?

Authors:  P J Klasse; Gabriel Ozorowski; Rogier W Sanders; John P Moore
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 21.023

5.  Parallel human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific CD8+ T-lymphocyte responses in blood and mucosa during chronic infection.

Authors:  F Javier Ibarrondo; Peter A Anton; Marie Fuerst; Hwee L Ng; Johnson T Wong; Jose Matud; Julie Elliott; Roger Shih; Mary Ann Hausner; Charles Price; Lance E Hultin; Patricia M Hultin; Beth D Jamieson; Otto O Yang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Evaluation of mucosal adjuvants and immunization routes for the induction of systemic and mucosal humoral immune responses in macaques.

Authors:  Ronald S Veazey; Asna Siddiqui; Katja Klein; Viviana Buffa; Lucia Fischetti; Lara Doyle-Meyers; Deborah F King; John S Tregoning; Robin J Shattock
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Occluding the mannose moieties on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 with griffithsin improves the antibody responses to both proteins in mice.

Authors:  Kaustuv Banerjee; Elizabeth Michael; Dirk Eggink; Thijs van Montfort; Amanda B Lasnik; Kenneth E Palmer; Rogier W Sanders; John P Moore; Per Johan Klasse
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.205

8.  Vaccine protection against simian immunodeficiency virus in monkeys using recombinant gamma-2 herpesvirus.

Authors:  John P Bilello; Julieta M Manrique; Young C Shin; William Lauer; Wenjun Li; Jeffrey D Lifson; Keith G Mansfield; R Paul Johnson; Ronald C Desrosiers
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Mucosal delivery of human papillomavirus pseudovirus-encapsidated plasmids improves the potency of DNA vaccination.

Authors:  B S Graham; R C Kines; K S Corbett; J Nicewonger; T R Johnson; M Chen; D LaVigne; J N Roberts; N Cuburu; J T Schiller; C B Buck
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 7.313

Review 10.  Mucosal correlates of protection in HIV-1-exposed sero-negative persons.

Authors:  Ruizhong Shen; Phillip D Smith
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.