Literature DB >> 15031596

Phase II study of gemcitabine combined with uracil-tegafur in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Jeeyun Lee1, Joon Oh Park, Won Seog Kim, Soon Il Lee, Seo Young Song, Do Hoon Lim, Seong-Ho Choi, Jin-Seok Heo, Kyu Taek Lee, Jong Kyun Lee, Kihyun Kim, Chul Won Jung, Young-Hyuck Im, Mark H Lee, Won Ki Kang, Keunchil Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The single agent gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent studies of a combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) revealed that survival data were superior to those with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone. The administration of oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) is more convenient and simulates the effect of a continuous or protracted infusion of 5-FU. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study of gemcitabine combined with UFT in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients and assessed the efficacy and the toxicity of the regimen.
METHODS: Twenty-two pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients (18 males, 4 females) were enrolled from December 2000 to September 2002. The regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks, and oral UFT 390 mg/m(2)/day (in 3 divided doses) on days 1-14. The cycle was repeated every 28 days. The objective tumor response was evaluated after 2 courses of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: 82 cycles were administered in total, with a median of 3 cycles per patient (range 1-6 cycles). The median age was 52 years (range 28-69 years). Response to treatment could be assessed in all patients. The objective response rate was 22.7% (95% CI, 7.8-45.4) with no complete response and 5 partial responses. Four patients (18.2%) had stable disease and 13 patients (59.1%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 4.2 months (range 0.9-13.6). The median overall survival was 5.8 months (range 0.5-13.6). Of 10 patients eligible for the assessment of clinical benefit response, 4 (40%, 95% CI 12.2-73.8) showed clinical benefit. Among 21 patients with baseline CA 19-9 levels, CA 19-9 was reduced by 50% or more in 12 patients (57.1%). The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3-4 toxic side effects were neutropenia (18.2%), anemia (4.5%), and diarrhea (4.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and UFT in metastatic pancreatic cancer was tolerable for most patients but showed modest response rates and clinical benefit. However, a randomized phase III study should be conducted in order to further test the efficacy of the regimen. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15031596     DOI: 10.1159/000076332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cytotoxic chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Advances to date and future directions.

Authors:  Henry Q Xiong; Kelli Carr; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  A phase II study of raltitrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  J J Arends; H P Sleeboom; M B L Leys; D Ten Bokkel Huinink; R S de Jong; J M Smit; J W R Nortier; M E T Tesselaar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  A varying-coefficient cox model for the effect of CA19-9 kinetics on overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yuntao Chen; Zhenyi Shao; Wen Chen; Hua Xie; Zhenyu Wu; Guoyou Qin; Naiqing Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  Chemotherapy for Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Complete Response Rates.

Authors:  Martin L Ashdown; Andrew P Robinson; Steven L Yatomi-Clarke; M Luisa Ashdown; Andrew Allison; Derek Abbott; Svetomir N Markovic; Brendon J Coventry
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.