Literature DB >> 15031275

Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?

H Iredell1, T Shaw, P Howat, R James, J Granich.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess whether contact by mail via an introductory postcard would increase the response rate to a telephone survey in a selected population of 348 people 60 years and older. Of this group, 208 were sent a postcard introducing the study and informing them that someone would call in the next 1-2 weeks to conduct a telephone interview. The remaining sample of 140 did not receive the introductory postcard. Amongst the potential participants who were contacted and able to participate (n = 240), the response rate for completed interview was 58.0% for those sent a postcard and 42.3% for those who were not. The refusal rate was 25.3% (postcard sent) and 37.2% (not sent a postcard). When the outcome of contact is collapsed to two categories, 'agreed to participate' and 'refusal', the response rate to participate was 73.5% (sent a postcard) and 59.0% (not sent a postcard) (chi(2) 5.14, d.f. 1, sign. 0.023). The response rate amongst those who recall being sent a postcard rose to 86.0%. Whether agreeing to participate or refusing to be involved in the survey was dependent on being sent an introductory postcard. The conclusion is that mailing a postcard prior to the first telephone contact increases the participation rates of older persons in a telephone survey at very little extra cost (A$0.60 per person).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15031275     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  6 in total

1.  Survey of older drivers' experiences with Florida's mandatory vision re-screening law for licensure.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Anne T McCartt; Keli A Braitman; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality.

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Enrique Rey; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah Jenkins; Kandace Lackore; Nicholas J Talley; Richard G Locke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  A randomised controlled trial of a physical activity and nutrition program targeting middle-aged adults at risk of metabolic syndrome in a disadvantaged rural community.

Authors:  Krysten Blackford; Jonine Jancey; Andy H Lee; Anthony P James; Peter Howat; Andrew P Hills; Annie Anderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Woolf; Phil Edwards
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Telephone survey as a method of data collection in South India.

Authors:  Mahalakshmy Thulasingam; Premarajan K Cheriyath
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2008-10

6.  Prostate cancer patients' self-reported participation in research: an examination of racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Nynikka R Palmer; Hala T Borno; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.532

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.