Literature DB >> 15030512

Oral administration of bovine whey proteins to mice elicits opposing immunoregulatory responses and is adjuvant dependent.

A O Afuwape1, M W Turner, S Strobel.   

Abstract

Most studies investigating the induction of oral tolerance (OT) use purified proteins such as ovalbumin (OVA), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and beta-lactoglobulin (beta-LG). Little information is available regarding the induction of OT to a protein mixture, e.g. cow's milk. In this study we compared the regulatory mechanisms induced after the oral administration of a whey protein concentrate (WP) derived from cow's milk following immunization with two different adjuvants, complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) and alum. OVA was used as a control antigen. Animals were given a single feed of these proteins at an equivalent dose of 1 mg/g body weight before they were immunized seven days later with the antigen in Freund's adjuvant or alum. Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses were suppressed by both a feed of WP and OVA after immunization with CFA. However, only OVA feeding suppressed antigen specific IgG responses. In an attempt to investigate whether WP would tolerize the more susceptible IgE responses, alum immunization replaced CFA as the adjuvant used for systemic immunizations. WP, after a single feed, significantly primed for DTH and IgE responses indicating oral sensitization to WP. In contrast, OVA suppressed DTH, IgE and IgG responses. Antigen specific proliferation of mononuclear cells was suppressed in mice fed OVA, but primed in those fed with WP. In addition cells taken from sensitized mice fed WP up-regulated levels of specific interleukin (IL) -4, -10 and -12 in vitro whereas these cytokines were suppressed in cultures from tolerant WP fed mice. Global suppression was obtained in cultures from tolerant OVA fed mice. TGF-beta was not detected in draining PLN cell cultures of either tolerant or sensitized mice. These data suggest that a whey protein mixture induces divergent responses following immunization with either CFA or alum despite being fed at an identical dose. We suggest that that the choice of the adjuvant may determine the immunoregulatory outcome and this is also reflected by the systemic cytokine profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15030512      PMCID: PMC1809005          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  48 in total

Review 1.  Antiinflammatory activities of lactoferrin.

Authors:  O M Conneely
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Suppressor T cells for IgE and IgG in Peyer's patches of mice made tolerant by the oral administration of ovalbumin.

Authors:  J Ngan; L S Kind
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Immunoglobulin E suppression and cytokine modulation in mice orally tolerized to beta-lactoglobulin.

Authors:  S Pecquet; A Pfeifer; S Gauldie; R Fritsché
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Lactoferrin immunomodulation of DTH response in mice.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Actor; Shen-An Hwang; Margaret Olsen; Michal Zimecki; Robert L Hunter; Marian L Kruzel
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.932

5.  Modulation of intestinal and systemic immune responses to a fed protein antigen, in mice.

Authors:  S Strobel; A Ferguson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Reconstitution of the cellular immune response by lactoferrin in cyclophosphamide-treated mice is correlated with renewal of T cell compartment.

Authors:  Jolanta Artym; Michal Zimecki; Marian L Kruzel
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.144

7.  Orally administered lactoferrin restores humoral immune response in immunocompromised mice.

Authors:  Jolanta Artym; Michal Zimecki; Maria Paprocka; Marian L Kruzel
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Immunological responses to fed protein antigens in mice. I. Reversal of oral tolerance to ovalbumin by cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  A M Mowat; S Strobel; H E Drummond; A Ferguson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Immunological responses to fed protein antigens in mice. II. Oral tolerance for CMI is due to activation of cyclophosphamide-sensitive cells by gut-processed antigen.

Authors:  S Strobel; A M Mowat; H E Drummond; M G Pickering; A Ferguson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Lactoferrin feeding augments peritoneal macrophage activities in mice intraperitoneally injected with inactivated Candida albicans.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Wakabayashi; Natsuko Takakura; Susumu Teraguchi; Yoshitaka Tamura
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.955

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oral gene application using chitosan-DNA nanoparticles induces transferable tolerance.

Authors:  Katja Goldmann; Stephan M Ensminger; Bernd M Spriewald
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-08-29

2.  A novel model of sensitization and oral tolerance to peanut protein.

Authors:  Jessica Strid; Melanie Thomson; Jonathan Hourihane; Ian Kimber; Stephan Strobel
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide enhances oral tolerance by regulating both cellular and humoral immune responses.

Authors:  Y Wang; Y Mei; S Bao; L Xu
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.330

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.