Literature DB >> 15029572

Implications of the Precautionary Principle in research and policy-making.

Philippe Grandjean1, John C Bailar, David Gee, Herbert L Needleman, David M Ozonoff, Elihu Richter, Morando Sofritti, Colin L Soskolne.   

Abstract

The Precautionary Principle (PP) has recently been formally introduced into national and international law. The key element is the justification for acting in the face of uncertainty. The PP is thereby a tool for avoiding possible future harm associated with suspected, but not conclusive, environmental risks. Under the PP, the burden of proof is shifted from demonstrating the presence of risk to demonstrating the absence of risk and it is the responsibility of the producer of a technology to demonstrate its safety rather than the responsibility of public authorities to show harm. Past experiences show the costly consequences of disregarding early warnings about environmental hazards. Today, the need for applying the PP is even greater. New research is needed to expand current insight into disease causation, to elucidate the full scope of potential adverse implications resulting from environmental pollutants, and to identify opportunities for prevention. Research approaches should be developed and strengthened to counteract innate ideological biases and to support our confidence in applying the PP for decision-making in the public policy arena. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15029572     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  7 in total

Review 1.  Late insights into early origins of disease.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.080

2.  The precautionary principle: in action for public health.

Authors:  Marco Martuzzi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Benzene-induced cancers: abridged history and occupational health impact.

Authors:  James Huff
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Late lessons from early warnings: Toward realism and precaution with endocrine-disrupting substances.

Authors:  David Gee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  A hazardous substance exposure prevention rating method for intervention needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation: the Small Business Exposure Index.

Authors:  Anthony D LaMontagne; Anne M Stoddard; Cora Roelofs; Grace Sembajwe; Amy L Sapp; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 7.  Regulation in the face of uncertainty: the evidence on electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes).

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Jacques Le Houezec
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-09-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.