Literature DB >> 15028708

Stochastic processes influence stationary-phase decisions in Bacillus subtilis.

Heather Maughan1, Wayne L Nicholson.   

Abstract

It has recently been proposed that phenotypic variation in clonal populations of bacterial species results from intracellular "noise," i.e., random fluctuations in levels of cellular molecules, which would be predicted to be insensitive to selective pressure. To test this notion, we propagated five populations of Bacillus subtilis for 5,000 generations with selection for one phenotype: the decision to sporulate. In support of the noise hypothesis, we report that none of the populations responded to selection by improving their efficiency of sporulation, indicating that intracellular noise is independent of heritable genotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028708      PMCID: PMC374405          DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.7.2212-2214.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  21 in total

1.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene.

Authors:  Ertugrul M Ozbudak; Mukund Thattai; Iren Kurtser; Alan D Grossman; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Genetic networks controlling the initiation of sporulation and the development of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  A D Grossman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 3.  Who's competent and when: regulation of natural genetic competence in bacteria.

Authors:  J M Solomon; A D Grossman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell.

Authors:  J L Spudich; D E Koshland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Environmental regulation of Bacillus subtilis sigma(D)-dependent gene expression.

Authors:  D B Mirel; W F Estacio; M Mathieu; E Olmsted; J Ramirez; L M Márquez-Magaña
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Purification of competent cells in the Bacillus subtilis transformation system.

Authors:  C Hadden; E W Nester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  S S Branda; J E González-Pastor; S Ben-Yehuda; R Losick; R Kolter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  FlgM is a primary regulator of sigmaD activity, and its absence restores motility to a sinR mutant.

Authors:  K Fredrick; J D Helmann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Adaptive, or stationary-phase, mutagenesis, a component of bacterial differentiation in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Huang-Mo Sung; Ronald E Yasbin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Spore UV and acceleration resistance of endolithic Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis isolates obtained from Sonoran desert basalt: implications for lithopanspermia.

Authors:  James N Benardini; John Sawyer; Kasthuri Venkateswaran; Wayne L Nicholson
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mutations leading to loss of sporulation ability in Bacillus subtilis are sufficiently frequent to favor genetic canalization.

Authors:  Joanna Masel; Heather Maughan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The roles of mutation accumulation and selection in loss of sporulation in experimental populations of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Heather Maughan; Joanna Masel; C William Birky; Wayne L Nicholson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Transcriptome divergence and the loss of plasticity in Bacillus subtilis after 6,000 generations of evolution under relaxed selection for sporulation.

Authors:  Heather Maughan; C William Birky; Wayne L Nicholson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Differentiation of Vegetative Cells into Spores: a Kinetic Model Applied to Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Emilie Gauvry; Anne-Gabrielle Mathot; Olivier Couvert; Ivan Leguérinel; Matthieu Jules; Louis Coroller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Engineering stochasticity in gene expression.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tabor; Travis S Bayer; Zachary B Simpson; Matthew Levy; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2008-05-01

6.  Effect of the Bacillus atrophaeus subsp. globigii Spo0F H101R mutation on strain fitness.

Authors:  Doncho V Zhelev; Mia Hunt; Anna Le; Christopher Dupuis; Suelynn Ren; Henry S Gibbons
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The Bacillus subtilis sin operon: an evolvable network motif.

Authors:  Christopher A Voigt; Denise M Wolf; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Repeated triggering of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis selects against a protein that affects the timing of cell division.

Authors:  Jeroen Siebring; Matthijs J H Elema; Fátima Drubi Vega; Akos T Kovács; Patsy Haccou; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Bet-hedging and epigenetic inheritance in bacterial cell development.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Veening; Eric J Stewart; Thomas W Berngruber; François Taddei; Oscar P Kuipers; Leendert W Hamoen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Agent-based modeling of competence phenotype switching in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Suzy M Stiegelmeyer; Morgan C Giddings
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.