Anna King1, Ian Phillips, Koné Kaniga. 1. Department of Infection, GKT School of Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, UK. anna.king@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We compared the in vitro activity of telavancin with that of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, moxifloxacin and ampicillin, penicillin or oxacillin as appropriate, by the NCCLS/EUCAST and BSAC methods. METHODS: The organisms (n = 401) included in the study were patient isolates from St Thomas' Hospital and were selected to include representatives of the clinically important Gram-positive aerobic species. Susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution methods on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the NCCLS/EUCAST guidelines, in comparison with Iso-Sensitest agar according to the BSAC guidelines. RESULTS: Telavancin was active against all the Gram-positive species tested and nearly 90% of isolates included in the study had telavancin MICs </= 1 mg/L. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and lactobacilli isolates with vancomycin MICs > 64 mg/L had telavancin MIC ranges of 0.5-8 and 2-16 mg/L, respectively. There was no evidence of cross-resistance with other comparator drugs. The results for telavancin for the two susceptibility testing methods were mostly either the same or within one doubling dilution. CONCLUSION: The susceptibility breakpoints for telavancin have yet to be established, but it would appear that telavancin has superior potency to the other tested glycopeptides, and on a weight-for-weight basis displays activity that is comparable to, or better than, that of the other agents tested.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the in vitro activity of telavancin with that of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, moxifloxacin and ampicillin, penicillin or oxacillin as appropriate, by the NCCLS/EUCAST and BSAC methods. METHODS: The organisms (n = 401) included in the study were patient isolates from St Thomas' Hospital and were selected to include representatives of the clinically important Gram-positive aerobic species. Susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution methods on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the NCCLS/EUCAST guidelines, in comparison with Iso-Sensitest agar according to the BSAC guidelines. RESULTS:Telavancin was active against all the Gram-positive species tested and nearly 90% of isolates included in the study had telavancin MICs </= 1 mg/L. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and lactobacilli isolates with vancomycin MICs > 64 mg/L had telavancin MIC ranges of 0.5-8 and 2-16 mg/L, respectively. There was no evidence of cross-resistance with other comparator drugs. The results for telavancin for the two susceptibility testing methods were mostly either the same or within one doubling dilution. CONCLUSION: The susceptibility breakpoints for telavancin have yet to be established, but it would appear that telavancin has superior potency to the other tested glycopeptides, and on a weight-for-weight basis displays activity that is comparable to, or better than, that of the other agents tested.
Authors: Alasdair P MacGowan; Alan R Noel; Sharon Tomaselli; Heather C Elliott; Karen E Bowker Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Deborah L Higgins; Ray Chang; Dmitri V Debabov; Joey Leung; Terry Wu; Kevin M Krause; Erik Sandvik; Jeffrey M Hubbard; Koné Kaniga; Donald E Schmidt; Qiufeng Gao; Robert T Cass; Dane E Karr; Bret M Benton; Patrick P Humphrey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Heather K Sun; Kenneth Duchin; Charles H Nightingale; Jeng-Pyng Shaw; Julie Seroogy; David P Nicolau Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.191