Literature DB >> 15028452

Long-term intracavernous therapy responders can potentially switch to sildenafil citrate after radical prostatectomy.

Rupesh Raina1, Milton M Lakin, Ashok Agarwal, Sandra Ausmundson, Drogo K Montague, Craig D Zippe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether long-term users of intracavernous (IC) injections after radical prostatectomy can switch to oral therapy with sildenafil citrate.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients (mean age 60.9 years) with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy were identified as long-term users of IC injections (3.7 +/- 1.9 years). These patients received open-label treatment with sildenafil citrate (50 to 100 mg) for a minimum of 4 weeks or five attempts. The primary outcome measure of our study was assessed by the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM) questionnaire (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF]). A successful switch was prospectively defined as erection sufficient for vaginal penetration after sildenafil use and compliance to therapy. Patients were designated as responders or nonresponders on the basis of their ability to achieve vaginal penetration.
RESULTS: Of 49 patients, only 36 agreed to receive oral open-label sildenafil (50 to 100 mg) for a minimum of 4 weeks or five attempts. Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) was used in 70% and triple therapy (PGE1, papaverine, and phentolamine) in the remaining 30%. Of the 36 patients, 15 (41%) successfully switched to sildenafil and discontinued IC injections. When the results were stratified by the type of IC solution, patients with high-dose triple therapy had a poor success rate of switch (7%) compared with patients using PGE1 treatment (67%). Of the 36 patients, 14 (38%) found sildenafil ineffective and continued using IC injections. Patients who switched to oral therapy had had a greater (P <0.001) total mean SHIM (IIEF-5) score with IC injections than those who did not switch (12.3 +/- 7.8 versus 20.0 +/- 4.9). Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) found sildenafil alone to be suboptimal but continued using it, enhancing the efficacy of IC injections alone. The three predictive factors for a successful switch were high preoperative SHIM (IIEF-5) score, high post-IC injection SHIM score, and type of IC medication used (PGE1 alone versus high-dose triple therapy).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term users of IC injection therapy can potentially switch to sildenafil citrate with acceptable sexual satisfaction. Patients will accept a lower degree of sexual satisfaction as measured by the IIEF-5 (SHIM) score if oral therapy is effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028452     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Advances in the Management of Post-Radical Prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: Treatment Strategies When PDE-5 Inhibitors Don't Work.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Erectile dysfunction and treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Culley C Carson; J Slade Hubbard; Eric Wallen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy in 2007.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Felix K-H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Achieving optimal delivery of follow-up care for prostate cancer survivors: improving patient outcomes.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Denalee M O'Malley; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2015-03-19

Review 6.  Sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: an overview of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.