OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether left ventricular (LV) mechanics are better under LV-based pacing than under right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) after atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation. BACKGROUND: "Ablate and pace" is an acceptable therapy for drug-refractory AF. However, the RV apical stimulation commonly used seems to interfere with the beneficial hemodynamic effect of regularization of heart rhythm. METHODS: The study included 12 patients (5 men, mean age 62 +/- 8.3 years), 6 with impaired and 6 with normal LV systolic function. All of them had a biventricular pacemaker system implanted and underwent atrioventricular node ablation for drug-refractory chronic AF. Using a conductance catheter, we analyzed LV pressure-volume loops during routine coronary angiography in order to evaluate short-term changes in LV mechanics during RV apical and LV-based (LV free wall or biventricular) pacing. RESULTS: Compared with RV pacing, LV-based pacing significantly improved the indexes of LV systolic function (i.e., end-systolic pressure and volume, cardiac index, stroke work, preload recruitable stroke work, maximal rate of rise of LV pressure [dP/dt(max)], LV ejection fraction, and end-systolic elastance). The LV diastolic filling indexes, end-diastolic pressure and volume, were better during LV-based pacing, whereas LV diastolic function indexes, -dP/dt(max), passive diastolic chamber stiffness, and time constant of LV isovolumic relaxation showed no clear change. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, LV-based pacing is superior to RV apical pacing in terms of contractile function and LV filling after AVJ ablation for drug-refractory AF.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether left ventricular (LV) mechanics are better under LV-based pacing than under right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) after atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation. BACKGROUND: "Ablate and pace" is an acceptable therapy for drug-refractory AF. However, the RV apical stimulation commonly used seems to interfere with the beneficial hemodynamic effect of regularization of heart rhythm. METHODS: The study included 12 patients (5 men, mean age 62 +/- 8.3 years), 6 with impaired and 6 with normal LV systolic function. All of them had a biventricular pacemaker system implanted and underwent atrioventricular node ablation for drug-refractory chronic AF. Using a conductance catheter, we analyzed LV pressure-volume loops during routine coronary angiography in order to evaluate short-term changes in LV mechanics during RV apical and LV-based (LV free wall or biventricular) pacing. RESULTS: Compared with RV pacing, LV-based pacing significantly improved the indexes of LV systolic function (i.e., end-systolic pressure and volume, cardiac index, stroke work, preload recruitable stroke work, maximal rate of rise of LV pressure [dP/dt(max)], LV ejection fraction, and end-systolic elastance). The LV diastolic filling indexes, end-diastolic pressure and volume, were better during LV-based pacing, whereas LV diastolic function indexes, -dP/dt(max), passive diastolic chamber stiffness, and time constant of LV isovolumic relaxation showed no clear change. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, LV-based pacing is superior to RV apical pacing in terms of contractile function and LV filling after AVJ ablation for drug-refractory AF.
Authors: P Kiès; C Leclercq; G B Bleeker; C Crocq; S G Molhoek; C Poulain; L van Erven; M Bootsma; K Zeppenfeld; E E van der Wall; J-C Daubert; M J Schalij; J J Bax Journal: Heart Date: 2005-09-13 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Brent C Lampert; Hans J Moore; Richard L Amdur; Pamela E Karasik; Brian M Lewis; Steven N Singh; Ross D Fletcher Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Nathan M Segerson; Stephen L Wasmund; Marcos Daccarett; Manuel L Fabela; Christopher H Hammond; Gregory Stoddard; Michael L Smith; Mohamed H Hamdan Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Savvas Toumanidis; Anna Kaladaridou; Dimitrios Bramos; Elias Skaltsiotes; John Agrios; Constantinos Pamboucas; George Kottis; Anna Antoniou; Elektra Papadopoulou; Spyridon Moulopoulos Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 1.866