Literature DB >> 15028202

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the new gold standard?

Xavier Cathelineau1, Carlos Arroyo, Francois Rozet, Herve Baumert, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy is the reference treatment for localized prostate cancer. The minimal invasive approach is gaining support in a large number of centers around the world because the laparoscopic approach seems to maintain the oncological control of open surgery with added benefits for the patient. In this paper, the main aspects of the different laparoscopic approaches, their benefits, difficulties, complications, and results are described and compared with the open radical prostatectomy. A critical review of the literature on radical prostatectomy comparing the open and laparoscopic techniques and the differences between each approach was done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028202     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-004-0022-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  27 in total

1.  Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrs Hoznek; Patrick Antiphon; Tomasz Borkowski; Matthew T Gettman; Ran Katz; Laurent Salomon; Safwat Zaki; Alexandre de la Taille; C lment-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; Douglas Skarecky; David Lee; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J L Stanford; Z Feng; A S Hamilton; F D Gilliland; R A Stephenson; J W Eley; P C Albertsen; L C Harlan; A L Potosky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Transperitoneal laparoscopy into the previously operated abdomen: effect on operative time, length of stay and complications.

Authors:  Brian D Seifman; Rodney L Dunn; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Bilateral nerve grafting during radical retropubic prostatectomy: extended follow-up.

Authors:  E D Kim; R Nath; K M Slawin; D Kadmon; B J Miles; P T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot.

Authors:  C C Abbou; A Hoznek; L Salomon; L E Olsson; A Lobontiu; F Saint; A Cicco; P Antiphon; D Chopin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; L Sentker; O Seemann; M Hatzinger; H J Rumpelt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; Brad Baize; Bertrand Guillonneau; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Isao Hara; Gaku Kawabata; Hideaki Miyake; Ichiro Nakamura; Shoji Hara; Hiroshi Okada; Sadao Kamidono
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.