Literature DB >> 15028128

Craniotomy for resection of pediatric brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: effects of provider caseloads and progressive centralization and specialization of care.

Edward R Smith1, William E Butler, Fred G Barker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Large provider caseloads are associated with better patient outcomes after many complex surgical procedures. Mortality rates for pediatric brain tumor surgery in various practice settings have not been described. We used a national hospital discharge database to study the volume-outcome relationship for craniotomy performed for pediatric brain tumor resection, as well as trends toward centralization and specialization.
METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional and longitudinal cohort study using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data for 1988 to 2000 (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD). Multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, geographic region, admission type (emergency, urgent, or elective), tumor location, and malignancy.
RESULTS: We analyzed 4712 admissions (329 hospitals, 480 identified surgeons) for pediatric brain tumor craniotomy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.6% and decreased from 2.7% (in 1988-1990) to 1.2% (in 1997-2000) during the study period. On a per-patient basis, median annual caseloads were 11 for hospitals (range, 1-59 cases) and 6 for surgeons (range, 1-32 cases). In multivariate analyses, the mortality rate was significantly lower at high-volume hospitals than at low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.52 for 10-fold larger caseload; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94; P = 0.03). The mortality rate was 2.3% at the lowest-volume-quartile hospitals (4 or fewer admissions annually), compared with 1.4% at the highest-volume-quartile hospitals (more than 20 admissions annually). There was a trend toward lower mortality rates after surgery performed by high-volume surgeons (P = 0.16). Adverse hospital discharge disposition was less likely to be associated with high-volume hospitals (P < 0.001) and high-volume surgeons (P = 0.004). Length of stay and hospital charges were minimally related to hospital caseloads. Approximately 5% of United States hospitals performed pediatric brain tumor craniotomy during this period. The burden of care shifted toward large-caseload hospitals, teaching hospitals, and surgeons whose practices included predominantly pediatric patients, indicating progressive centralization and specialization.
CONCLUSION: Mortality and adverse discharge disposition rates for pediatric brain tumor craniotomy were lower when the procedure was performed at high-volume hospitals and by high-volume surgeons in the United States, from 1988 to 2000. There were trends toward lower mortality rates, greater centralization of surgery, and more specialization among surgeons during this period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028128     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000108421.69822.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  26 in total

Review 1.  Shared care--is it worth it for the patient?

Authors:  Iolo Doull
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Survey on the management of anorectal malformations (ARM) in European pediatric surgical centers of excellence.

Authors:  Anna Morandi; Benno Ure; Ernesto Leva; Martin Lacher
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  A comprehensive analysis of early outcomes and complication rates after 769 craniotomies in pediatric patients.

Authors:  M von Lehe; H-J Kim; J Schramm; M Simon
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Does size matter? Minimally invasive approach in pediatric neurosurgery--a review of 125 minimally invasive surgeries in children: clinical history and operative results.

Authors:  M Renovanz; A K Hickmann; A Gutenberg; M Bittl; N J Hopf
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Hospital teaching status associated with reduced inpatient mortality and perioperative complications in surgical neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Evan M Luther; David McCarthy; Katherine M Berry; Nikhil Rajulapati; Ashish H Shah; Daniel G Eichberg; Ricardo J Komotar; Michael Ivan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary pediatric brain tumor clinics: the key to successful treatment?

Authors:  Mohamed S Abdel-Baki; Emily Hanzlik; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

7.  Surgical outcome of patients considered to have "inoperable" tumors by specialized pediatric neuro-oncological multidisciplinary teams.

Authors:  Charles Teo; Teo Charles; Morgan Broggi; Broggi Morgan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Neonatal surgery in low- vs. high-volume institutions: a KID inpatient database outcomes and cost study after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, and gastroschisis.

Authors:  Stig Sømme; Niti Shahi; Lisa McLeod; Michelle Torok; Beth McManus; Moritz M Ziegler
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Miriam Nuño; Chirag G Patil; Patrick Lyden; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  The use of patient navigators to improve cancer care for Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Loreley Robie; Daniela Alexandru; Daniela A Bota
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2011-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.