Literature DB >> 15027970

Effects of various anesthetic agents on laryngeal motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs.

Aaron M Jackson1, Karen Tobias, Cassie Long, Joseph Bartges, Ralph Harvey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of various drugs and drug combinations conventionally used for anesthesia on arytenoid cartilage motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Six large breed healthy dogs with no previous history of respiratory dysfunction.
METHODS: Each dog was randomly assigned to a different injectable anesthetic protocol once weekly for 6 weeks, then in the 7th week all dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane. Videolaryngoscopy was performed and recorded starting immediately after induction until dogs could no longer be safely restrained for endoscopy. Video was digitized and 3 still images of maximal inspiration and expiration from the first 15 seconds (induction) and the last 15 seconds (recovery) were captured and imported into an image analysis software program. The height and area of the laryngeal ostium were measured in pixels. Normalization of the glottal gap area was performed using the formula (normalized glottal gap area (NGGA)=area in pixels/height(2)). ANOVA was performed on the NGGA of images collected at inspiration and expiration during induction and recovery. Fischer's exact test was performed when significance (P<.05) was found.
RESULTS: Within each protocol, laryngeal motion (defined as change in NGGA) at induction was not significantly different from laryngeal motion measured at recovery. Additionally, no significant differences were found in arytenoid motion immediately after induction when anesthetic protocols were compared. Arytenoid motion before recovery was significantly greater with thiopental when compared with propofol (P=.046), ketamine+diazepam (P=.0098), acepromazine+thiopental (P=.0021), and acepromazine+propofol (P=.0065). No significant difference in arytenoid motion was seen immediately after induction or before recovery when acepromazine+butorphanol+ isoflurane and thiopental were compared.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that intravenous thiopental given to effect is the best choice for assessing laryngeal function in dogs. Dogs premedicated with acepromazine with or without opioids that require further anesthetic restraint for laryngoscopy should be anesthetized with isoflurane administered by mask. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Misdiagnosis of laryngeal paralysis during laryngoscopy can be avoided by selecting the anesthetic regimens with the least effect on arytenoid motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  6 in total

1.  Effects of alfaxalone, thiopental, or propofol and diazepam on laryngeal motion in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Barbara Ambros; M Casey Gaunt; Tanya Duke-Novakovski; Susan M Taylor
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Comparison between propofol and alfaxalone anesthesia for the evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs utilizing computerized software.

Authors:  Po-Ching Pan; Christine Savidge; Pierre Amsellem; Stephanie Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Laryngeal stent for acute and chronic respiratory distress in seven dogs with laryngeal paralysis.

Authors:  María Cecilia Ricart; Sergio Martín Rodríguez; Roberto Miguel Duré
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2020-01-16

4.  Anaesthetic induction and recovery characteristics of a diazepam-ketamine combination compared with propofol in dogs.

Authors:  Jacques P Ferreira; T Brighton Dzikit; Gareth E Zeiler; Roxanne Buck; Bruce Nevill; Bruce Gummow; Lynette Bester
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.474

5.  Comparison of methohexital and propofol as induction agents for evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Mikala B Brown; Danielle R Dugat; Shane D Lyon; Laura A Nafe; Mark E Payton; Sarah K Peakheart; Rebecca S Salazar
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 1.495

Review 6.  The Influence of Anaesthetic Drugs on the Laryngeal Motion in Dogs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ranninger; Marta Kantyka; Rima Nadine Bektas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.