Literature DB >> 15027497

Assessing tumor-related signs and symptoms to support cancer drug approval.

Grant Williams1, Richard Pazdur, Robert Temple.   

Abstract

Cancer causes premature death and significant, often devastating, symptoms. While prolongation of survival is an obvious end point for new cancer drug approval, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also utilized end points that evaluate patient symptoms. In this article we discuss the end points, evidence, and analyses supporting cancer drug approvals based on evaluations of tumor-related signs and symptoms. With advice from the Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) in the late 1970s and early 1980s, FDA determined that acceptable end points for cancer drug approval were survival or an improvement in the quality of a patient's life, e.g., an improvement in tumor-related symptoms. This article summarizes 15 FDA cancer drug approvals based on patient symptom assessments and/or physical signs (thought to represent symptomatic improvement) as the primary evidence of effectiveness. These include painful bone events (three cases), cosmetic improvement in Kaposi's sarcoma and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (six cases), the consequences (decreased transfusions, etc.) of long-duration responses in leukemias and lymphomas (two cases), relief of pulmonary or esophageal obstruction (two cases), and one case each of symptom benefit in pancreatic cancer (also associated with survival benefit) and pulmonary symptom benefit in lung cancer. An instructive example of an individual patient benefit end point is discussed, though it did not lead to a drug approval (the cisplatin-epinephrine gel application). Improved trial designs and analysis plans may allow greater reliance on morbidity assessments to support future cancer drug approvals. Drug sponsors are encouraged to include symptom assessments in cancer clinical trials and to perform further research to improve symptom-assessment methods. The FDA routinely meets with sponsors at End of Phase 2 Meetings to discuss drug development plans and the design of phase 3 trials. We encourage sponsors to request special protocol assessments (SPA) after meeting with the FDA to get written confirmation of the adequacy of plans for assessing cancer morbidity and quality of life, including protocols, end points, statistical analysis plans, and draft case report forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027497     DOI: 10.1081/BIP-120028503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  8 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life in patients with pleural mesothelioma using a modified version of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): psychometric properties of the LCSS-Meso.

Authors:  Patricia J Hollen; Richard J Gralla; Astra M Liepa; James T Symanowski; James J Rusthoven
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  [Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastasis in Lung Cancer (2019 Version)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-20

3.  A preliminary study of a health related quality of life assessment of priority symptoms in advanced lymphoma: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Symptom Index.

Authors:  Fay J Hlubocky; Kimberly Webster; Jennifer Beaumont; John Cashy; Diane Paul; Amy Abernethy; Karen L Syrjala; Jamie Von Roenn; David Cella
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-02-07

4.  A Comparison of the Renal Cell Carcinoma-Symptom Index (RCC-SI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI).

Authors:  Deepa Rao; Zeeshan Butt; Sarah Rosenbloom; Don Robinson; Jamie Von Roenn; Timothy M Kuzel; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Measuring symptoms as a critical component of drug development and evaluation in hematological diseases.

Authors:  Loretta A Williams; Emre Yucel; Jorge E Cortes; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-01

6.  Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib vs interferon-alpha in a phase III trial: final results and geographical analysis.

Authors:  D Cella; M D Michaelson; A G Bushmakin; J C Cappelleri; C Charbonneau; S T Kim; J Z Li; R J Motzer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Symptom burden among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): content for a symptom index.

Authors:  Gale Harding; David Cella; Don Robinson; Parthiv J Mahadevia; Jason Clark; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  [Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis in lung cancer (2014 version)].

Authors:  Yan Sun; Zhongzhen Guan; Meilin Liao; Xin Yu; Changli Wang; Jie Wang; Xiaohui Niu; Yuankai Shi; Xiuyi Zhi; Yunpeng Liu; Mengzhong Liu; Yiping Zhang; Yue Yang; Jingnan Shen; Gongyan Chen; Qinghua Zhou; Caicun Zhou; Qisen Guo; Lili Tang; Jianchun Duan; Jun Liang; Yingjian Zhang; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2014-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.