Literature DB >> 15027105

Calculation of electrostatic interaction energies in molecular dimers from atomic multipole moments obtained by different methods of electron density partitioning.

Anatoliy Volkov1, Philip Coppens.   

Abstract

Accurate and fast evaluation of electrostatic interactions in molecular systems is still one of the most challenging tasks in the rapidly advancing field of macromolecular chemistry, including molecular recognition, protein modeling and drug design. One of the most convenient and accurate approaches is based on a Buckingham-type approximation that uses the multipole moment expansion of molecular/atomic charge distributions. In the mid-1980s it was shown that the pseudoatom model commonly used in experimental X-ray charge density studies can be easily combined with the Buckingham-type approach for calculation of electrostatic interactions, plus atom-atom potentials for evaluation of the total interaction energies in molecular systems. While many such studies have been reported, little attention has been paid to the accuracy of evaluation of the purely electrostatic interactions as errors may be absorbed in the semiempirical atom-atom potentials that have to be used to account for exchange repulsion and dispersion forces. This study is aimed at the evaluation of the accuracy of the calculation of electrostatic interaction energies with the Buckingham approach. To eliminate experimental uncertainties, the atomic moments are based on theoretical single-molecule electron densities calculated at various levels of theory. The electrostatic interaction energies for a total of 11 dimers of alpha-glycine, N-acetylglycine and L-(+)-lactic acid structures calculated according to Buckingham with pseudoatom, stockholder and atoms-in-molecules moments are compared with those evaluated with the Morokuma-Ziegler energy decomposition scheme. For alpha-glycine a comparison with direct "pixel-by-pixel" integration method, recently developed Gavezzotti, is also made. It is found that the theoretical pseudoatom moments combined with the Buckingham model do predict the correct relative electrostatic interactions energies, although the absolute interaction energies are underestimated in some cases. The good agreement between electrostatic interaction energies computed with Morokuma-Ziegler partitioning, Gavezzotti's method, and the Buckingham approach with atoms-in-molecules moments demonstrates that reliable and accurate evaluation of electrostatic interactions in molecular systems of considerable complexity is now feasible. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027105     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  7 in total

1.  Generalization of the Gaussian electrostatic model: extension to arbitrary angular momentum, distributed multipoles, and speedup with reciprocal space methods.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Thomas A Darden
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros; Mikko Karttunen; Pengyu Ren; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  QM/MM Simulations with the Gaussian Electrostatic Model: A Density-based Polarizable Potential.

Authors:  Hatice Gökcan; Eric Kratz; Thomas A Darden; Jean-Philip Piquemal; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Anisotropic, Polarizable Molecular Mechanics Studies of Inter- and Intramolecular Interactions and Ligand-Macromolecule Complexes. A Bottom-Up Strategy.

Authors:  Nohad Gresh; G Andrés Cisneros; Thomas A Darden; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Ewald-based methods for Gaussian integral evaluation: application to a new parameterization of GEM.

Authors:  Robert E Duke; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  GEM*: A Molecular Electronic Density-Based Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Robert E Duke; Oleg N Starovoytov; Jean-Philip Piquemal; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Experimental Electron Density and Neutron Diffraction Studies on the Polymorphs of Sulfathiazole.

Authors:  Ioana Sovago; Matthias J Gutmann; J Grant Hill; Hans Martin Senn; Lynne H Thomas; Chick C Wilson; Louis J Farrugia
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.076

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.