Literature DB >> 15027079

Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.

J D Lewsey1.   

Abstract

Stratified randomized designs are popular in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) because they increase the chance of the intervention groups being well balanced in terms of identified prognostic factors at baseline and may increase statistical power. The objective of this paper is to assess the gains in power obtained by stratifying randomization by cluster size, when cluster size is associated with an important cluster level factor which is otherwise unaccounted for in data analysis. A simulation study was carried out using a CRT where UK general practices were the randomized units as a template. The results show that when cluster size is strongly associated with a cluster level factor which is predictive of outcome, the stratified randomized design has superior power results to the completely randomized design and that the superiority is related to the number of clusters. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027079     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Sample size considerations when groups are the appropriate unit of analysis.

Authors:  Georgia Robins Sadler; Celine Marie Ko; Jennifer Alisangco; Bradley P Rosbrook; Eric Miller; Judith Fullerton
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.

Authors:  Xiaohan Xu; Hong Zhu; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A pragmatic cluster randomized trial evaluating the impact of a community pharmacy intervention on statin adherence: rationale and design of the Community Pharmacy Assisting in Total Cardiovascular Health (CPATCH) study.

Authors:  Charity D Evans; Dean T Eurich; Jeff G Taylor; Alfred J Remillard; Yvonne M Shevchuk; David F Blackburn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Efficacy of a Community-Based Physical Activity Program KM2H2 for Stroke and Heart Attack Prevention among Senior Hypertensive Patients: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Phase-II Trial.

Authors:  Jie Gong; Xinguang Chen; Sijian Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Joanne E McKenzie; Simon D French; Denise A O'Connor; Duncan S Mortimer; Colette J Browning; Grant M Russell; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; Jill J Francis; Susan Michie; Kerry Murphy; Fiona Kossenas; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 7.327

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.