Literature DB >> 15025064

To test or not to test: do workplace drug testing programs discourage employee drug use?

Michael T French1, M Christopher Roebuck, Pierre Kébreau Alexandre.   

Abstract

Workplace drug testing programs are often met with intense criticism. Despite resistance among labor and consumer groups and a lack of rigorous empirical evidence regarding effectiveness, drug testing programs have remained popular with employers throughout the 1990s and into the current century. The present study analyzed nationally representative data on over 15,000 US households to determine whether various types of workplace drug testing programs influenced the probability of drug use by workers. The study estimated several empirical specifications using both univariate and bivariate probit techniques. The specification tests favored the bivariate probit model over the univariate probit model. Estimated marginal effects of drug testing on any drug use were negative, significant, and relatively large, indicating that drug testing programs are achieving one of the desired effects. The results were similar when any drug use was replaced with chronic drug use in the models. These results have important policy implications regarding the effectiveness and economic viability of workplace anti-drug programs. 2003 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15025064     DOI: 10.1016/s0049-089x(03)00038-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Res        ISSN: 0049-089X


  9 in total

1.  Workplace drug testing and worker drug use.

Authors:  Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Evidence base for pre-employment medical screening.

Authors:  Joseph Pachman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Thermographic detection and quantification of THC in oral fluid at unprecedented low concentrations.

Authors:  Damber Thapa; Nakisa Samadi; Nisarg Patel; Nima Tabatabaei
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Drug violations and aviation accidents: findings from the US mandatory drug testing programs.

Authors:  Guohua Li; Susan P Baker; Qi Zhao; Joanne E Brady; Barbara H Lang; George W Rebok; Charles DiMaggio
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  A randomized trial of employment-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in injection drug users.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman; Conrad J Wong; Mick Needham; Karly N Diemer; Todd Knealing; Darlene Crone-Todd; Michael Fingerhood; Paul Nuzzo; Kenneth Kolodner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

Review 6.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

7.  Predictors of Positive Illicit Drug Tests After OEF/OIF Deployment Among Army Enlisted Service Members.

Authors:  Mary Jo Larson; Beth A Mohr; Diana D Jeffery; Rachel Sayko Adams; Thomas V Williams
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers.

Authors:  Charl Els; Tanya D Jackson; Mathew T Milen; Diane Kunyk; Graeme Wyatt; Daniel Sowah; Reidar Hagtvedt; Danika Deibert; Sebastian Straube
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-27

Review 9.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of employer-led interventions for drug misuse.

Authors:  Maxwell O Akanbi; Cassandra B Iroz; Linda C O'Dwyer; Adovich S Rivera; Megan Colleen McHugh
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.