Literature DB >> 15024689

Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions.

Walter T Ambrosius1, Ethan M Lange, Carl D Langefeld.   

Abstract

One of the first and most important steps in planning a genetic association study is the accurate estimation of the statistical power under a proposed study design and sample size. In association studies for candidate genes or in fine-mapping applications, allele and genotype frequencies are often assumed to be known when, in fact, they are unknown (i.e., random variables from some distribution). For example, if we consider a diallelic marker with allele frequencies of 0.5 and 0.5 and Hardy-Weinberg proportions, the three genotype frequencies are often assumed to be 0.25, 0.50, and 0.25, and the statistical power is calculated. Unfortunately, ignoring this source of variation can inflate the estimated power of the study. In the present article, we propose averaging the estimates of power over the distribution of the genotype frequencies to calculate the true estimate of power for a fixed allele frequency. For the usual situation, in which allele frequencies in a population are not known, we propose placing a prior distribution on the allele frequency, taking advantage of any available genotype information. This Bayesian approach provides a more accurate estimate of power. We present examples for quantitative and qualitative traits in cohort studies of unrelated individuals and results from an extensive series of examples that show that ignoring the uncertainty in allele frequencies can inflate the estimated power of the study. We also present the results from case-control studies and show that standard methods may also overestimate power. As discussed in this article, the approach of fixing allele frequencies even if they are not known is the common approach to power calculations. We show that ignoring the sources of variation in allele frequencies tends to result in overestimates of power and, consequently, in studies that are underpowered. Software in C is available at http://www.ambrosius.net/Power/.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15024689      PMCID: PMC1181944          DOI: 10.1086/383282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  13 in total

1.  Tests for genetic association using family data.

Authors:  Mei-Chiung Shih; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  The power of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) with both case-parent and control-parent trios.

Authors:  H W Deng; W M Chen
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Power and replication in case-control studies.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Lalouel; Andreas Rohrwasser
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Power and efficiency of the TDT and case-control design for association scans.

Authors:  Ralph McGinnis; Sagiv Shifman; Ariel Darvasi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Power calculations for genetic association studies using estimated probability distributions.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Sample size determinants for r X c comparative trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  An exact test for Hardy-Weinberg and multiple alleles.

Authors:  E J Louis; E R Dempster
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Genetic variants in the epithelial sodium channel in relation to aldosterone and potassium excretion and risk for hypertension.

Authors:  W T Ambrosius; L J Bloem; L Zhou; J F Rebhun; P M Snyder; M A Wagner; C Guo; J H Pratt
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

Authors:  R S Spielman; R E McGinnis; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The Finland-United States investigation of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus genetics (FUSION) study. I. An autosomal genome scan for genes that predispose to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Ghosh; R M Watanabe; T T Valle; E R Hauser; V L Magnuson; C D Langefeld; D S Ally; K L Mohlke; K Silander; K Kohtamäki; P Chines; J Balow; G Birznieks; J Chang; W Eldridge; M R Erdos; Z E Karanjawala; J I Knapp; K Kudelko; C Martin; A Morales-Mena; A Musick; T Musick; C Pfahl; R Porter; J B Rayman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 11.043

View more
  14 in total

1.  The power of the sign test given uncertainty in the proportion of tied observations.

Authors:  Paul J Nietert; Mary J Dooley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Role of in silico tools in gene discovery.

Authors:  Bing Yu
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; Sholom Wacholder; Mitchell H Gail; Ulrike Peters; Kevin B Jacobs; Stephen J Chanock; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Functional interaction between APOE4 and LDL receptor isoforms in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D Cheng; R Huang; I S Lanham; H M Cathcart; M Howard; E H Corder; S E Poduslo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Power for studies with random group sizes.

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Jonathan D Mahnken
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Design of the value of imaging in enhancing the wellness of your heart (VIEW) trial and the impact of uncertainty on power.

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Tamar S Polonsky; Philip Greenland; David C Goff; Letitia H Perdue; Stephen P Fortmann; Karen L Margolis; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Systematic screening of lysyl oxidase-like (LOXL) family genes demonstrates that LOXL2 is a susceptibility gene to intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Akagawa; Akira Narita; Haruhiko Yamada; Atsushi Tajima; Boris Krischek; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Tomokatsu Hori; Motoo Kubota; Naokatsu Saeki; Akira Hata; Tohru Mizutani; Ituro Inoue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Somatic mutations and germline sequence variants in the expressed tyrosine kinase genes of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Michael H Tomasson; Zhifu Xiang; Richard Walgren; Yu Zhao; Yumi Kasai; Tracie Miner; Rhonda E Ries; Olga Lubman; Daved H Fremont; Michael D McLellan; Jacqueline E Payton; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Daniel C Link; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; Mark Watson; Jack Baty; Sharon Heath; William D Shannon; Rakesh Nagarajan; Clara D Bloomfield; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Timothy J Ley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  A population-based association study of glutamate decarboxylase 1 as a candidate gene for autism.

Authors:  Henriette Nørmølle Buttenschøn; Marlene Briciet Lauritsen; Agata El Daoud; Mads Hollegaard; Meta Jorgensen; Kristine Tvedegaard; David Hougaard; Anders Børglum; Poul Thorsen; Ole Mors
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Statistical power of model selection strategies for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Zheyang Wu; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.