Literature DB >> 15023963

Sulfitobacter delicatus sp. nov. and Sulfitobacter dubius sp. nov., respectively from a starfish (Stellaster equestris) and sea grass (Zostera marina).

Elena P Ivanova1,2, Nataliya M Gorshkova2, Tomoo Sawabe3, Natalia V Zhukova4, Karin Hayashi3, Valerie V Kurilenko2, Yulia Alexeeva1, Vlado Buljan5, Dan V Nicolau1, Valery V Mikhailov2, Richard Christen5.   

Abstract

On the basis of data from phenotypic and genotypic characterization and analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, two novel species belonging to the genus Sulfitobacter are described. Strains KMM 3584(T), a pale-yellowish, non-motile strain isolated from a starfish (Stellaster equestris), and KMM 3554(T), which is motile by means of a single subpolar flagellum and was isolated from sea grass (Zostera marina), are marine, Gram-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped organisms. Both strains have the ability to degrade gelatin, but not casein, chitin, agar, DNA, Tween 80 or starch. Strain KMM 3584(T) decomposed alginate and grew at NaCl concentrations of 1-8 % and temperatures of 12-37 degrees C, whereas strain KMM 3554(T) grew in 1-12 % NaCl and at temperatures of 10-30 degrees C. The predominant fatty acid was 18 : 1omega7, amounting to up to 80 % of the total fatty acids. The other characteristic feature was the presence of 18 : 2 isomers. The DNA G+C contents of KMM 3584(T) and KMM 3554(T) were respectively 60.0 and 63.7 mol%. The level of DNA similarity between the two strains was 33 %. DNA from KMM 3584(T) and KMM 3554(T) had hybridization values of 5-24 % and 10-41 %, respectively, with DNA from the type strains of Sulfitobacter pontiacus, Sulfitobacter brevis, Sulfitobacter mediterraneus and Staleya guttiformis. It is proposed that strains KMM 3584(T) (=LMG 20554(T)=ATCC BAA-321(T)) and KMM 3554(T) (=LMG 20555(T)=ATCC BAA-320(T)) represent two novel species, Sulfitobacter delicatus sp. nov. and Sulfitobacter dubius sp. nov., respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15023963     DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02654-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  12 in total

Review 1.  Overview of the marine roseobacter lineage.

Authors:  Alison Buchan; José M González; Mary Ann Moran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sulfitobacter pontiacus subsp. fungiae subsp. nov., Isolated from Coral Fungia seychellensis from Andaman Sea, and Description of Sulfitobacter pontiacus subsp. pontiacus subsp. nov.

Authors:  Sherin Zachariah; Prabla Kumari; Subrata K Das
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  "Pseudoalteromonas januaria" SUT 11 as the source of rare lipodepsipeptides.

Authors:  Nataliya I Kalinovskaya; Andrey S Dmitrenok; Tatyana A Kuznetsova; Galina M Frolova; Richard Christen; Hartmut Laatsch; Yulia V Alexeeva; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Description of a sulfitobacter strain and its extracellular cyclodipeptides.

Authors:  Cong Long; Xiao-Ling Lu; Yun Gao; Bing-Hua Jiao; Xiao-Yu Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Insights into Diversity and Imputed Metabolic Potential of Bacterial Communities in the Continental Shelf of Agatti Island.

Authors:  Shreyas V Kumbhare; Dhiraj P Dhotre; Sunil Kumar Dhar; Kunal Jani; Deepak A Apte; Yogesh S Shouche; Avinash Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Lindane Bioremediation Capability of Bacteria Associated with the Demosponge Hymeniacidon perlevis.

Authors:  Stabili Loredana; Pizzolante Graziano; Morgante Antonio; Nonnis Marzano Carlotta; Longo Caterina; Aresta Antonella Maria; Zambonin Carlo; Corriero Giuseppe; Alifano Pietro
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  The Biogeographical Distribution of Benthic Roseobacter Group Members along a Pacific Transect Is Structured by Nutrient Availability within the Sediments and Primary Production in Different Oceanic Provinces.

Authors:  Marion Pohlner; Julius Degenhardt; Avril J E von Hoyningen-Huene; Bernd Wemheuer; Nora Erlmann; Bernhard Schnetger; Thomas H Badewien; Bert Engelen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Diverse Bacteria Utilize Alginate Within the Microbiome of the Giant Kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.

Authors:  Jordan D Lin; Matthew A Lemay; Laura W Parfrey
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The Alteration of Intestinal Microbiota Profile and Immune Response in Epinephelus coioides during Pathogen Infection.

Authors:  Joan Tang Xiao Joe; Yung-Che Tseng; Jen-Leih Wu; Ming-Wei Lu
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  Endophytic bacterial community of a Mediterranean marine angiosperm (Posidonia oceanica).

Authors:  Neus Garcias-Bonet; Jesus M Arrieta; Charles N de Santana; Carlos M Duarte; Núria Marbà
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.