Literature DB >> 15023190

Process evaluation of two environmental nutrition programmes and an educational nutrition programme conducted at supermarkets and worksite cafeterias in the Netherlands.

I Steenhuis1, P van Assema, A Reubsaet, G Kok.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This article describes the process evaluation of two environmental programmes and an educational nutrition programme, implemented at supermarkets and worksite cafeterias. Studies conducted earlier, indicated that the programmes had no effect on consumers' eating behaviour. Consequently, the more specific purpose of the present study was to identify explanations for the ineffectiveness of the programmes and to formulate recommendations for future programmes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The environmental programmes included labelling of healthy products and increasing the range of healthy foods on offer. The education programme consisted of several elements, such as brochures and a self-help guide. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 managers of supermarkets and worksite cafeterias where the programmes were implemented.
RESULTS: Although materials were not always entirely compatible with the different supermarkets and worksite cafeterias, the degree of implementation was satisfactory. According to the managers, the programmes were not striking enough, the labelling would have been more effective if it had discriminated between different brands of a product, and the number of new products was too small compared with the total range of foods on offer.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that programmes should be promoted intensively. Furthermore, the relevant manufacturers and wholesalers supplying worksite cafeterias should be encouraged to increase their range of suitable low-fat products. Finally, the feasibility and possible effects of brand-specific labelling should be investigated further.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15023190     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2004.00507.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  11 in total

1.  Process evaluation of a food marketing and environmental change intervention in Tiendas that serve Latino immigrants in North Carolina.

Authors:  Barbara Baquero; Laura Linnan; Barbara A Laraia; Guadalupe X Ayala
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-02-10

2.  Efficacy of a store-based environmental change intervention compared with a delayed treatment control condition on store customers' intake of fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  Guadalupe X Ayala; Barbara Baquero; Barbara A Laraia; Ming Ji; Laura Linnan
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Effects of interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels on food purchases: protocol for the Starlight randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ekaterina Volkova; Bruce Neal; Mike Rayner; Boyd Swinburn; Helen Eyles; Yannan Jiang; Jo Michie; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  What is the effectiveness of obesity related interventions at retail grocery stores and supermarkets? -a systematic review.

Authors:  Abdulfatah Adam; Jørgen D Jensen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Enablers and barriers to improving worksite canteen nutrition in Pudong, China: a mixed-methods formative research study.

Authors:  Ruoran Li; You Wu; Limei Jing; Lindsay M Jaacks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  What happened in the 'Move for Well-being in School': a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  Søren Smedegaard; Ruben Brondeel; Lars Breum Christiansen; Thomas Skovgaard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  The 'Eat Well @ IGA' healthy supermarket randomised controlled trial: process evaluation.

Authors:  Miranda R Blake; Gary Sacks; Christina Zorbas; Josephine Marshall; Liliana Orellana; Amy K Brown; Marj Moodie; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Jaithri Ananthapavan; Fabrice Etilé; Adrian J Cameron
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debbie Wierenga; Luuk H Engbers; Pepijn Van Empelen; Saskia Duijts; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem Van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Systematic review: a systems innovation perspective on barriers and facilitators for the implementation of healthy food-store interventions.

Authors:  Cédric N H Middel; Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar; Joreintje D Mackenbach; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Food Consumption Determinants and Barriers for Healthy Eating at the Workplace-A University Setting.

Authors:  João P M Lima; Sofia A Costa; Teresa R S Brandão; Ada Rocha
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.