Literature DB >> 15020559

Symptom-based framework for assessing quality of HIV care.

Steven M Asch1, Allen M Fremont, Barbara J Turner, Allen Gifford, J Allen McCutchan, W M Christopher Mathews, Samuel A Bozzette, Martin F Shapiro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV quality of care using a symptom-based, patient-centered framework.
METHODS: An expert panel developed 13 quality indicators for three common symptoms: cough with fever and/or shortness of breath; severe or persistent diarrhea; and significant weight loss. A nationally representative probability sample of HIV-infected adults was interviewed between 1996 and 1997. PARTICIPANTS: were asked about the presence and severity of HIV symptoms during the preceding 6 months, and care received. Variation in adherence to the indicators was assessed by symptom type and patient characteristics.
RESULTS: In all, 2864 (71%) patients completed interviews and 920 reported being at least moderately bothered with one of the three symptoms. Of these, 41, 74, and 65% of patients with a symptom of cough, weight loss, or diarrhea, respectively, reported receiving all indicated care. Performance was better for patients with more severe HIV, measured as a CD4 cell count <50 cells/microliter, compared with those with less severe HIV, measured as CD4 cell count >500 cells/microliter (43% versus 60%; P = 0.02). Uninsured patients had worse performance than Medicare patients (45% versus 62%; P = 0.04), but care did not differ by patient's age, gender, ethnicity, HIV risk factor, providers' HIV patient load, or region. Only CD4 count remained significantly associated with performance in the multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptom-based quality indicators may provide a useful supplement to conventional measures. Patients with HIV reported substantial underuse of services for common, burdensome symptoms. Although adherence to quality indicators was better for patients with more advanced HIV disease, many still received suboptimal care. Vulnerable patient groups generally did not receive worse quality of care, suggesting that symptom-based measures of quality may measure domains that are distinct from those captured by conventional indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020559     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Is patient-perceived severity of a geriatric condition related to better quality of care?

Authors:  Lillian C Min; David B Reuben; Emmett Keeler; David A Ganz; Constance H Fung; Paul Shekelle; Carol P Roth; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Patient and provider-reported symptoms in the post-cART era.

Authors:  E J Edelman; K Gordon; A C Justice
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-05

3.  The Symptom Experience of HIV/HCV-Coinfected Adults.

Authors:  Carol Bova; Carol Jaffarian; Pauline Himlan; Linda Mangini; Lisa Ogawa
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.354

4.  Impact of clinical reminder redesign on learnability, efficiency, usability, and workload for ambulatory clinic nurses.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Emily S Patterson; Laura Militello; Shilo Anders; Mercedes Falciglia; Jennifer A Wissman; Emilie M Roth; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emanuel Catumbela; Victor Certal; Alberto Freitas; Carlos Costa; António Sarmento; Altamiro da Costa Pereira
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.