BACKGROUND: Exposure to tobacco products is readily assessed through self- or interview-administered questionnaires. Degree of misreporting among participants in chemoprevention trials is unknown. We assessed the level of discrepancy between self-reported smoking exposure and plasma cotinine among participants in a chemoprevention trial. METHODS: Analyses were conducted among 824 men and women who participated in a dietary trial of adenoma recurrence. Smoking exposure was ascertained through self-administered questionnaires at three time-points. Plasma cotinine was measured by gas chromatography among 283 never, 446 former and 95 current self-reported smokers. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using various plasma cotinine cut-points. RESULTS: Degree of misclassification for self-reported current smokers was minor (0-3%), regardless of cotinine cut-point used. Using a cut-point of 20 ng/ml, which takes into account exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers, sensitivity and specificity were 98.9% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that degree of misreport for current smokers is extremely low; however, approximately 20% of self-reported never smokers misreport their exposure, suggesting that validation of self-report is needed for these individuals.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to tobacco products is readily assessed through self- or interview-administered questionnaires. Degree of misreporting among participants in chemoprevention trials is unknown. We assessed the level of discrepancy between self-reported smoking exposure and plasma cotinine among participants in a chemoprevention trial. METHODS: Analyses were conducted among 824 men and women who participated in a dietary trial of adenoma recurrence. Smoking exposure was ascertained through self-administered questionnaires at three time-points. Plasma cotinine was measured by gas chromatography among 283 never, 446 former and 95 current self-reported smokers. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using various plasma cotinine cut-points. RESULTS: Degree of misclassification for self-reported current smokers was minor (0-3%), regardless of cotinine cut-point used. Using a cut-point of 20 ng/ml, which takes into account exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers, sensitivity and specificity were 98.9% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that degree of misreport for current smokers is extremely low; however, approximately 20% of self-reported never smokers misreport their exposure, suggesting that validation of self-report is needed for these individuals.
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; John T Bernert; Jonathan Foulds; Stephen S Hecht; Peyton Jacob; Martin J Jarvis; Anne Joseph; Cheryl Oncken; Megan E Piper Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Henrietta L Logan; Roger B Fillingim; Linda M Bartoshuk; Pamela Sandow; Scott L Tomar; John W Werning; William M Mendenhall Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Nadine Jackson McCleary; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al Benson; Richard Goldberg; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elyse R Park; Jamie S Ostroff; Giselle K Perez; Kelly A Hyland; Nancy A Rigotti; Sarah Borderud; Susan Regan; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Friedman; Douglas E Levy; Susan Holland; Justin Eusebio; Lisa Peterson; Julia Rabin; Jacob Miller-Sobel; Irina Gonzalez; Laura Malloy; Maureen O'Brien; Suhana de León-Sanchez; C Will Whitlock Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 2.226