Literature DB >> 15018475

Nutritional demands in acute and chronic illness.

Rosemary A Richardson1, H Isobel M Davidson.   

Abstract

Common to both acute and chronic disease are disturbances in energy homeostasis, which are evidenced by quantitative and qualitative changes in dietary intake and increased energy expenditure. Negative energy balance results in loss of fat and lean tissue. The management of patients with metabolically-active disease appears to be simple; it would involve the provision of sufficient energy to promote tissue accretion. However, two fundamental issues serve to prevent nutritional demands in disease being met. The determination of appropriate energy requirements relies on predictive formulae. While equations have been developed for critically-ill populations, accurate energy prescribing in the acute setting is uncommon. Only 25-32% of the patients have energy intakes within 10% of their requirements. Clearly, the variation in energy expenditure has led to difficulties in accurately defining the energy needs of the individual. Second, the acute inflammatory response initiated by the host can have profound effects on ingestive behaviour, but this area is poorly understood by practising clinicians. For example, nutritional targets have been set for specific disease states, i.e. pancreatitis 105-147 kJ (25-35 kcal)/kg; chronic liver disease 147-168 kJ (35-40 kcal)/kg, but given the alterations in gut physiology that accompany the acute-phase response, targets are unlikely to be met. In cancer cachexia attenuation of the inflammatory response using eicosapentaenoic acid results in improved nutritional intake and status. This strategy poses an attractive proposition in the quest to define nutritional support as a clinically-effective treatment modality in other disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15018475     DOI: 10.1079/PNS2003302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anorexia in cancer: role of feeding-regulatory peptides.

Authors:  Simona Perboni; Akio Inui
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Even low-grade inflammation impacts on small intestinal function.

Authors:  Katri Peuhkuri; Heikki Vapaatalo; Riitta Korpela
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Genotype X diet interactions in mice predisposed to mammary cancer. I. Body weight and fat.

Authors:  Ryan R Gordon; Kent W Hunter; Peter Sørensen; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Effects of High-Protein Diet and/or Resveratrol Supplementation on the Immune Response of Irradiated Rats.

Authors:  Kyoung Ok Kim; Hyunjin Park; Hyun-Sook Kim
Journal:  Prev Nutr Food Sci       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Precipitating factors and targeted therapies in combating the perils of sickle cell disease--- A special nutritional consideration.

Authors:  Shahida A Khan; Ghazi Damanhouri; Ashraf Ali; Sarah A Khan; Aziz Khan; Ahmed Bakillah; Samy Marouf; Ghazi Al Harbi; Saeed H Halawani; Ahmad Makki
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.169

6.  Characters of Nutrition Status and Energy-delivery Patterns of the University-based Surgical Intensive Care Units in Thailand (Multi-center THAI-SICU Study).

Authors:  Supakrit Auiwattanakul; Kaweesak Chittawatanarat; Onuma Chaiwat; Sunthiti Morakul; Suneerat Kongsayreepong; Winai Ungpinitpong; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt; Supawan Buranapin
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2018-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.