Literature DB >> 15018276

Modulating the homeostatic process to predict performance during chronic sleep restriction.

Michael L Johnson1, Gregory Belenky, Daniel P Redmond, David R Thorne, Jason D Williams, Steven R Hursh, Thomas J Balkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most current sleep/performance models, the homeostatic process is generally conceived as a simple reservoir in which performance capacity increases exponentially during sleep and decays either linearly or exponentially during wakefulness. Models that include this notional homeostatic process have been successful for describing sleep-performance data under conditions of irregular sleep schedules, jet lag, and short periods of total sleep loss. However, recently described data from sleep restriction studies indicate that recovery following chronically restricted sleep is considerably slower than would be predicted by these models. These findings suggest that chronic sleep restriction induces relatively long-term, slow-recovering changes in brain physiology that affect alertness and performance.
METHODS: This paper describes, both conceptually and mathematically, a generic modification to sleep/performance models that facilitates the ability to predict the rate at which alertness and performance restoration occurs during recovery sleep following chronic sleep restriction. Weighted nonlinear least-squares methods were used to compare the proposed modulated homeostatic model with recent sleep/performance observations during chronic sleep restriction and recovery.
RESULTS: When compared with the classical Walter Reed homeostatic model, this proposed model was found to provide a better description of sleep restriction and recovery observations. The proposed model was also found to be consistent with the data from a recent University of Pennsylvania study.
CONCLUSIONS: These two models make significantly different predictions of performance during both the recovery phase and the chronic sleep restriction phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15018276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  8 in total

1.  A Unified Model of Performance: Validation of its Predictions across Different Sleep/Wake Schedules.

Authors:  Sridhar Ramakrishnan; Nancy J Wesensten; Thomas J Balkin; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  A new mathematical model for the homeostatic effects of sleep loss on neurobehavioral performance.

Authors:  Peter McCauley; Leonid V Kalachev; Amber D Smith; Gregory Belenky; David F Dinges; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Dynamic circadian modulation in a biomathematical model for the effects of sleep and sleep loss on waking neurobehavioral performance.

Authors:  Peter McCauley; Leonid V Kalachev; Daniel J Mollicone; Siobhan Banks; David F Dinges; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Banking sleep: realization of benefits during subsequent sleep restriction and recovery.

Authors:  Tracy L Rupp; Nancy J Wesensten; Paul D Bliese; Thomas J Balkin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Effects of sleep deprivation on sleep homeostasis and restoration during methadone-maintenance: a [31]P MRS brain imaging study.

Authors:  George H Trksak; J Eric Jensen; David T Plante; David M Penetar; Wendy L Tartarini; Melissa A Maywalt; Michael Brendel; Cynthia M Dorsey; Perry F Renshaw; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Modeling fatigue over sleep deprivation, circadian rhythm, and caffeine with a minimal performance inhibitor model.

Authors:  Patrick L Benitez; Gary H Kamimori; Thomas J Balkin; Alexander Greene; Michael L Johnson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Modeling the adenosine system as a modulator of cognitive performance and sleep patterns during sleep restriction and recovery.

Authors:  Andrew J K Phillips; Elizabeth B Klerman; James P Butler
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Prediction of shiftworker alertness, sleep, and circadian phase using a model of arousal dynamics constrained by shift schedules and light exposure.

Authors:  Stuart A Knock; Michelle Magee; Julia E Stone; Saranea Ganesan; Megan D Mulhall; Steven W Lockley; Mark E Howard; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Tracey L Sletten; Svetlana Postnova
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.849

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.