Literature DB >> 15017450

Telephone social support and education for adaptation to prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Kathleen Walsh Scura1, Wendy Budin, Ellen Garfing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention of telephone social support and education to increase the physical, emotional, functional, and interpersonal adaptation of men to prostate cancer.
DESIGN: Prospective, random assignment to experimental or control treatments.
SETTING: Urban New Jersey. SAMPLE: 17 men diagnosed with prostate cancer within four weeks of study entry. Mean age was 66 years (range = 51-78); 59% were Caucasian, 35% were African American, and 6% were American Indian.
METHODS: Subjects in the experimental group received telephone social support over a 12-month period in addition to education via mailed resource kits. The control group received education through mailed resource kits only. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-General Physical, Emotional, Functional, and Social/Family Well-Being subscales; Symptom Experience Scale-Prostate; and the Relationship Change Scale were administered initially and at the end of each of the three phases; the International Index of Erectile Function Scale was administered at the end of each of the three phases. Qualitative information was gathered throughout and at the conclusion of the study. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Physiologic, emotional, functional, and social adaptation to prostate cancer.
FINDINGS: Results were somewhat more favorable for the experimental group on all outcome measures; however, differences were not statistically significant. Structured interviews with 14 of 17 subjects revealed that telephone social support and education were effective in increasing adaptation to prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a significant difference between the experimental and treatment groups in this small sample of men, analysis of trends and interview feedback indicated that telephone social support, in addition to education through a mailed resource kit, has the potential to be beneficial by increasing access to supportive services. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Telephone social support when supplementing patient education may assist men in adapting during the year following a prostate cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017450     DOI: 10.1188/04.ONF.335-338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  7 in total

1.  Who benefits from a psychosocial counselling versus educational intervention to improve psychological quality of life in prostate cancer survivors?

Authors:  Terry A Badger; Chris Segrin; Aurelio J Figueredo; Joanne Harrington; Kate Sheppard; Stacey Passalacqua; Alice Pasvogel; Maria Bishop
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2012-10-09

Review 2.  Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Andrew M Colman; Carolyn Tarrant; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; Shona Agarwal
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Early decision and psychosocial support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer: an integrated approach.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Megan Ferguson; Samantha Clutton; R A Frank Gardiner; David Nicol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Emma Ream; Amanda Euesden Hughes; Anna Cox; Katy Skarparis; Alison Richardson; Vibe H Pedersen; Theresa Wiseman; Angus Forbes; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-02

Review 5.  Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials.

Authors:  Theresa Helen Mazzarello Moore; Anna Jyoti Louise King; Maggie Evans; Debbie Sharp; Raj Persad; Alyson Louise Huntley
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachelle Brick; Lynne Padgett; Jennifer Jones; Kelley Covington Wood; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Timothy F Marshall; Grace Campbell; Rachel Eilers; Sareh Keshavarzi; Ann Marie Flores; Julie K Silver; Aneesha Virani; Alicia A Livinski; Mohammed Faizan Ahmed; Tiffany Kendig; Bismah Khalid; Jeremy Barnett; Anita Borhani; Graysen Bernard; Kathleen Doyle Lyons
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Galway; Amanda Black; Marie Cantwell; Chris R Cardwell; Moyra Mills; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.