Literature DB >> 15017433

Chromosomal gains and genomic loss of p53 and p16 genes in Barrett's esophagus detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization of cytology specimens.

Mona Fahmy1, Marek Skacel, Terry L Gramlich, Jennifer A Brainard, Thomas W Rice, John R Goldblum, Jason T Connor, Graham Casey, Mona S Legator, Raymond R Tubbs, Gary W Falk.   

Abstract

Endoscopic brush cytology is a promising surveillance technique for Barrett's esophagus. Ancillary markers are sought to increase the sensitivity of cytology and allow identification of patients at increased risk for disease progression. To determine if there are specific genetic changes in Barrett's esophagus with associated high-grade dysplasia/intramucosal adenocarcinoma compared to those without dysplasia, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on cytologic specimens using probes to chromosomes and genomic regions previously described as altered in this disease. We studied archival brush cytology slides from 40 Barrett's esophagus patients: 21 with biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and 19 with no dysplasia and a minimum 5 years of negative follow-up. Centromeric enumeration probes (CEP) for chromosomes 6, 7, 11, and 12, and locus-specific probes (LSI) for 9p21 (p16 gene), and 17p13.1 (p53 gene) loci along with their corresponding CEP (9 and 17, respectively) were used in this study. A positive FISH result was defined as the presence of cells with >2 CEP signals or with a loss of the LSI signals relative to their corresponding CEP. p53 locus loss and/or aneusomy of chromosomes 6, 7, 11, and 12 abnormalities could be detected by FISH in routinely processed endoscopic brush cytology specimens from 95% of biopsy-positive cases with a specificity of 100%. Interestingly, all five cases with cytologic changes classified as indefinite for dysplasia from patients with a positive biopsy showed changes by FISH. Loss of the p16 locus was seen commonly in patients both with and without dysplasia/carcinoma. Selected biomarkers from this study merit further investigation to determine their potential to detect genetic changes in patients with Barrett's esophagus prior to the development of high-grade dysplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017433     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  17 in total

Review 1.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

2.  Detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with in vivo depth-resolved nuclear morphology measurements.

Authors:  Neil G Terry; Yizheng Zhu; Matthew T Rinehart; William J Brown; Steven C Gebhart; Stephanie Bright; Elizabeth Carretta; Courtney G Ziefle; Masoud Panjehpour; Joseph Galanko; Ryan D Madanick; Evan S Dellon; Dimitri Trembath; Ana Bennett; John R Goldblum; Bergein F Overholt; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Adam Wax
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Open questions in oesophageal adenocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Chromosome 11 aneusomy in esophageal cancers and precancerous lesions--an early event in neoplastic transformation: an interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization study from south India.

Authors:  Vasavi Mohan; Shivani Ponnala; Hemakumar M Reddy; Radha Sistla; Rachel A Jesudasan; Yog Raj Ahuja; Qurratulain Hasan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Clinical implications of molecular changes in pediatric Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Licia Pensabene; Marta C Cohen; Michael Thomson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

7.  The development of a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Shannon M Brankley; Kenneth K Wang; Aaron R Harwood; Dylan V Miller; Mona S Legator; Lori S Lutzke; Benjamin R Kipp; Larry E Morrison; Kevin C Halling
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 8.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly R Haisley; James P Dolan; Susan B Olson; Sergio A Toledo-Valdovinos; Kyle D Hart; Gene Bakis; Brintha K Enestvedt; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Molecular pathological diagnosis for early esophageal cancer in Kazakh patients.

Authors:  Idiris Awut; Madiniyet Niyaz; Hadeti Biekemitoufu; Zhu Zhang; Ilyar Sheyhedin; Wen Hao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.