Literature DB >> 15017207

The risk of finding focal cancer (less than 3 mm) remains high on re-biopsy of patients with persistently increased prostate specific antigen but the clinical significance is questionable.

Bjørn Zackrisson1, Gunnar Aus, Svante Bergdahl, Hans Lilja, Pär Lodding, Carl-Gustav Pihl, Jonas Hugosson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the significance of focal prostate cancer found in sextant biopsies in men participating in a biennial prostate specific antigen (PSA) based screening program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1995, 10000 men 50 to 65 years old were randomized to biennial screening with PSA testing. Sextant biopsies were recommended when total PSA was 3 ng/ml or greater at screening rounds 1 and 2, and 2.54 ng/ml or greater at subsequent screening rounds. Focal cancer was defined as total a core cancer length of less than 3 mm in the biopsy specimen. Low volume cancer was defined as a total tumor volume of less than 0.5 cm in the radical retropubic prostatectomy specimen.
RESULTS: The number of men who underwent biopsy and the number of cancers detected in the 5 possible sets of biopsies were 1725 and 402, 706 and 124, 307 and 36, 103 and 9, and 13 and 0, respectively. The risk of detecting focal cancer was 7.9%, 10.2%, 7.5%, 5.8% and 0%, respectively, but the relative ratio (focal-to-all cancers) increased 34%, 58%, 64%, 67% and, not applicable, respectively. In men with a total core cancer length of less than 10 mm there was no correlation between core cancer length and total tumor volume, as measured in the prostatectomy specimen. Two-thirds of men with a total core cancer length of less than 3 mm had a tumor volume of greater than 0.5 cm, while the risk of low volume cancer was less than 5% only in men with a total core cancer length of greater than 10 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: In a repeat PSA based screening program sextant biopsies are of little or no value for predicting tumor volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017207     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118052.59597.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy.

Authors:  M Roethke; A G Anastasiadis; M Lichy; M Werner; P Wagner; S Kruck; Claus D Claussen; A Stenzl; H P Schlemmer; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?

Authors:  L Schimmöller; M Quentin; D Blondin; F Dietzel; A Hiester; C Schleich; C Thomas; R Rabenalt; H E Gabbert; P Albers; G Antoch; C Arsov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ([¹H]MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in identifying prostate cancer foci in patients with negative biopsy and high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

Authors:  V Panebianco; A Sciarra; M Ciccariello; D Lisi; S Bernardo; S Cattarino; V Gentile; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Single foci prostate cancer: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ioannis Efthimiou; Konstadinos Skrepetis; Elefteria Bournia
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-07-28

5.  Repeat Targeted Prostate Biopsy under Guidance of Multiparametric MRI-Correlated Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Patients with Previous Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Dong Ryul Jang; Dae Chul Jung; Young Taik Oh; Songmi Noh; Kyunghwa Han; Kiwook Kim; Koon-Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.