Literature DB >> 15017190

Clinical and urodynamic evaluation after ureterocystoplasty and kidney transplantation.

William C Nahas1, Marcos Lucon, Eduardo Mazzucchi, Iaonnis M Antonopoulos, Affonso C Piovesan, Elias David Neto, Luiz E Ianhez, Sami Arap.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed clinical and surgical results in renal transplantation candidates with voiding dysfunction and end stage renal disease who underwent bladder augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 8 patients 3 to 30 years old with dilated ureters, voiding dysfunction and end stage renal disease who underwent renal transplantation following bladder augmentation from 1995 to 2003. The etiology of bladder dysfunction was neurogenic bladder in 3 patients, posterior urethral valves in 3 and vesicoureteral reflux in 2. All cases were assessed by ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography and urodynamic studies.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 50 months (range 4 to 93). Previous urodynamic evaluation revealed a bladder capacity of 75 to 294 ml (mean +/- SD 167.38 +/- 77.32) and an intravesical pressure of 28 to 100 mm H2O (mean 51.25 +/- 22.17). Urodynamic study after augmentation and kidney transplantation showed a bladder capacity of 191 to 400 ml (mean 335.25 +/- 99.01) and an intravesical pressure of 15 to 35 mm H2O (mean 28 +/- 9.45). Mean serum creatinine was 1.65 mg/dl (range 0.8 to 2.5). All patients remained continent. Three patients with neurogenic bladder empty the bladder by clean intermittent catheterization and the others empty by the Valsalva maneuver. None of the grafts were lost and the most common complication was asymptomatic urinary tract infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder augmentation is a well-known procedure for low capacity and poorly compliant bladders even in candidates for a renal transplant. Ureterocystoplasty combines the benefits common to all enterocystoplasties without adding to complications or risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017190     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118761.88563.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Kidney transplants in patients with bladder augmentation: correlation and evolution.

Authors:  Jose Maria Garat; Jorge Caffaratti; Oriol Angerri; Anna Bujons; Humberto Villavicencio
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Outcome of renal transplant in patients with abnormal urinary tract.

Authors:  Cristian Sager; Carol Burek; Víctor Durán; Juan Pablo Corbetta; Santiago Weller; Enrique Paz; Juan Carlos López
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Clinical characteristics of renal transplant recipients that underwent urologic surgery for de novo disease before and after transplantation.

Authors:  Kwan-Sik Bae; Jung-Sik Huh; Young-Joo Kim; Sung-Goo Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Alternatives to conventional enterocystoplasty in children: a critical review of urodynamic outcomes.

Authors:  Ricardo González; Barbara M Ludwikowski
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Renal transplantation into optimized abnormal lower urinary tract - Impact on graft outcomes, patient survival, and complications.

Authors:  Selvin Theodore Jayanth; Anuj Deep Dangi; Rajiv Paul Mukha; Santosh Kumar; Santosh Varughese; Vinoi G David; Anna Valson; J Chandrasingh; Antony Devasia; Nitin Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

6.  Pertinent issues in pretransplant recipient workup.

Authors:  Pranjal Modi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

7.  Kidney transplantation in abnormal bladder.

Authors:  Shashi K Mishra; V Muthu; Mohan M Rajapurkar; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

8.  25 years of live related renal transplantation in children: The Buenos Aires experience.

Authors:  Eduardo Ruiz; Jorge Ferraris
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10

9.  Bladder augmentation: Review of the literature and recent advances.

Authors:  Serhat Gurocak; Jody Nuininga; Iyimser Ure; Robert P E De Gier; Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10

Review 10.  The evolution of bladder augmentation: from creating a reservoir to reconstituting an organ.

Authors:  Roman Jednak
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.