Literature DB >> 15016934

How to assess epidemiological studies.

J H Zaccai1.   

Abstract

Assessing the quality of an epidemiological study equates to assessing whether the inferences drawn from it are warranted when account is taken of the methods, the representativeness of the study sample, and the nature of the population from which it is drawn. Bias, confounding, and chance can threaten the quality of an epidemiological study at all its phases. Nevertheless, their presence does not necessarily imply that a study should be disregarded. The reader must first balance any of these threats or missing information with their potential impact on the conclusions of the report.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016934      PMCID: PMC1742948          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.012633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  20 in total

1.  Smoking behavior among casino employees: self-report validation using plasma cotinine.

Authors:  H J Shaffer; G B Eber; M N Hall; J Vander Bilt
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  A personal critique: evidence-based medicine, methodology, and ethics of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  M Zwitter
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P Jüni; D G Altman; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

Review 4.  Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis.

Authors:  Dean Fergusson; Shawn D Aaron; Gordon Guyatt; Paul Hébert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-21

Review 6.  Condom use as a dependent variable: measurement issues relevant to HIV prevention programs.

Authors:  R A Crosby
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  1998-12

Review 7.  Assessing the methodological quality of published papers.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-02

Review 8.  Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  R Akehurst; E Kaltenthaler
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Use of self-report to monitor overweight and obesity in populations: some issues for consideration.

Authors:  V Flood; K Webb; R Lazarus; G Pang
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 10.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The effects of estradiol on mood and behavior in human female adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ben W R Balzer; Sally-Anne Duke; Catherine I Hawke; Katharine S Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at time of hospital or intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  James A McKinnell; Loren G Miller; Samantha J Eells; Eric Cui; Susan S Huang
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Physical Activity in Preventing Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Stefano Brini; Hamid R Sohrabi; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Mira Karrasch; Heikki Hämäläinen; Ralph N Martins; Timothy J Fairchild
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Do people with risky behaviours participate in biomedical cohort studies?

Authors:  Anne W Taylor; Eleonora Dal Grande; Tiffany Gill; Catherine R Chittleborough; David H Wilson; Robert J Adams; Janet F Grant; Patrick Phillips; Richard E Ruffin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The statistical importance of P-POSSUM scores for predicting mortality after emergency laparotomy in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Gary A Bass; Rebecka Ahl; Arvid Pourlotfi; Håkan Geijer; Scott Montgomery; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 6.  Reproductive Health Risks Associated with Occupational and Environmental Exposure to Pesticides.

Authors:  Aleksandra Fucic; Radu C Duca; Karen S Galea; Tihana Maric; Kelly Garcia; Michael S Bloom; Helle R Andersen; John E Vena
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  The burden of diabetes mellitus during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lovney Kanguru; Navya Bezawada; Julia Hussein; Jacqueline Bell
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 8.  Digital Epidemiology: Use of Digital Data Collected for Non-epidemiological Purposes in Epidemiological Studies.

Authors:  Hyeoun-Ae Park; Hyesil Jung; Jeongah On; Seul Ki Park; Hannah Kang
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-10-31

Review 9.  What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis.

Authors:  Sabine S Lange; Sean E Mulholland; Michael E Honeycutt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Algorithm for sample availability prediction in a hospital-based epidemiological study spreadsheet-based sample availability calculator.

Authors:  Amrit Sudershan; Kanak Mahajan; Rakesh K Panjaliya; Manoj K Dhar; Parvinder Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.