Literature DB >> 15016725

Between-method variation in human chorionic gonadotropin test results.

Laurence A Cole1, Jaime M Sutton, Trefor N Higgins, George S Cembrowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results on sera and calibrators vary 1.4- to 2.3-fold among commercial human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) assays. The relative contributions of calibrators, standards, hCG charge isoforms, and major structural variants to this variation have not been quantified.
METHODS: Purified hCG was separated by isoelectric focusing into four fractions with pI ranges of 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, and 6-7. These four fractions together with pure hCG, hyperglycosylated hCG, hCG beta-subunit (hCGb), nicked hCG, and hCGb core fragment (hCGbcf) were tested in nine commonly used commercial serum assays for hCG. The compositions of pure hCG preparations, standards, and commercial hCG preparations were determined by immunoassay.
RESULTS: The three pure hCG preparations and the four hCG charge isoforms each showed parallel responses in the nine commercial hCG assays. Although wide variations were found in the detection of hCG structural variants by the nine assays (range for hyperglycosylated hCG, 468-1544 IU/L; for hCGb, 3187-5535 IU/L; for nicked hCG, 2736-4240 IU/L; and for hCGbcf, <2-130 IU/L), this did not correlate with the between-method variation observed in results for the three pure hCG preparations. Commercial preparations of hCG and calibrators showed great variation in their content of hCG structural variants (from 34% to 100% intact hCG).
CONCLUSIONS: Intermethod differences in hCG results were not explained by changes in responses attributable to hCG charge isoforms or to hCG structural variants, but wide variation was observed in concentrations of hCG structural variants in calibrators and in detection of these structural variants. Differences in assay specificity and in composition of the calibrators are the most likely sources of between-method variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016725     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.026989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  9 in total

Review 1.  New discoveries on the biology and detection of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Authors:  Laurence A Cole
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  Gestational and Non-gestational Trophoblastic Disease. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/049, December 2015).

Authors:  C Tempfer; L-C Horn; S Ackermann; M W Beckmann; R Dittrich; J Einenkel; A Günthert; H Haase; J Kratzsch; M C Kreissl; S Polterauer; A D Ebert; K T M Schneider; H G Strauss; F Thiel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Immunoextraction-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring intact human chorionic gonadotropin, free β-subunit, and β-subunit core fragment in urine.

Authors:  Getachew A Woldemariam; Anthony W Butch
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  The sensitivity and specificity of hyperglycosylated hCG (hhCG) levels to reliably diagnose clinical IVF pregnancies at 6 days following embryo transfer.

Authors:  Charles M Strom; Ruben Bonilla-Guererro; Ke Zhang; Kevin J Doody; David Tourgeman; Ruben Alvero; Marcelle I Cedars; Beryl Crossley; Raj Pandian; Rajesh Sharma; Julie Neidich; Denise Salazar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Human trophoblast function during the implantation process.

Authors:  Elsebeth Staun-Ram; Eliezer Shalev
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Reference ranges and determinants of total hCG levels during pregnancy: the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Tim I M Korevaar; Eric A P Steegers; Yolanda B de Rijke; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; W Edward Visser; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Henning Tiemeier; Theo J Visser; Marco Medici; Robin P Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  A rational diagnostic approach to the "phantom hCG" and other clinical scenarios in which a patient is thought to be pregnant but is not.

Authors:  Oluwafunmilayo Oyatogun; Mandeep Sandhu; Stephanie Barata-Kirby; Erin Tuller; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2021-06-13

8.  Candidate epitopes for measurement of hCG and related molecules: the second ISOBM TD-7 workshop.

Authors:  P Berger; E Paus; P M Hemken; C Sturgeon; W W Stewart; J P Skinner; L C Harwick; S C Saldana; C S Ramsay; K R Rupprecht; K H Olsen; J-M Bidart; U-H Stenman
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-09-26

9.  Hemolytic specimens in complete blood cell count: Red cell parameters could be revised by plasma free hemoglobin.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Peng; Wenqing Xiang; Jianming Zhou; Jiajia Cao; Zhe Li; Hui Gao; Junfeng Zhang; Hongqiang Shen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.