Literature DB >> 15016706

Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: high rate of complications needs explanation.

J Donnez, J Squifflet, P Jadoul, M Smets.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15016706      PMCID： PMC381145          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.328.7440.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases.

Authors:  A Wattiez; D Soriano; S B Cohen; P Nervo; M Canis; R Botchorishvili; G Mage; J L Pouly; P Mille; M A Bruhat
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2002-08

2.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Brent C Opmeer; Peggy M Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Gérard L Bremer; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

2.  Is there still need for a further randomised controlled trial on the route of hysterectomy for benign disease?

Authors:  T J Clark; E Saridogan
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.