Literature DB >> 15016457

Do laboratory salinity tolerances of freshwater animals correspond with their field salinity?

Ben J Kefford1, Phil J Papas, Leon Metzeling, Dayanthi Nugegoda.   

Abstract

The degree to which laboratory derived measures of salinity tolerance reflect the field distributions of freshwater biota is uncertain. In this paper we compare laboratory-derived acute salinity tolerance (LC(50) values) of freshwater macroinvertebrates (range 5.5-76 mS/cm) and fish (range 2.7-82 mS/cm) from southeastern Australia with the salinity from which they have been collected in the field. Only 4% of the macroinvertebrates were collected at salinity levels substantially higher than their 72-h LC(50) obtained from directly transferring animals from low salinity water to the water they were tested (direct transfer LC(50)). This LC(50) value was correlated with the maximum salinity at which a species had been collected. For common macroinvertebrates, the maximum field salinity was approximated by the direct transfer 72-h LC(50). For adult freshwater fish, 21% of species were collected at salinities substantially greater than their acute direct transfer LC(50) and there was a weak relationship between these two variables. Although there was a weak correlation between the direct transfer LC(50) of early life stages of freshwater fish and the maximum field salinity, 58% of the field distribution were in higher than their LC(50) values. In contrast, LC(50) determined from experiments that acclimated adult fish to higher salinity (slow acclimation) provided a better indication of the field distribution: with only one fish species (7%) being in conflict with their maximum field salinity and a strong positive relationship between these variables. This study shows that laboratory measures of acute salinity tolerance can reflect the maximum salinity that macroinvertebrate and fish species inhabit and are consistent with some anecdotal observations from other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016457     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  14 in total

1.  Temperature affects acute mayfly responses to elevated salinity: implications for toxicity of road de-icing salts.

Authors:  John K Jackson; David H Funk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparative salinity tolerance of three indigenous tropical freshwater cladoceran species; Moinodaphnia macleayi, Ceriodaphnia rigaudii and Diaphanosoma brachyurum.

Authors:  Azad Mohammed; John B R Agard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A study of the effect of physical and chemical stressors on biological integrity within the San Diego hydrologic region.

Authors:  Kristofor A Voss; Alex Pohlman; Shekar Viswanathan; David Gibson; Joe Purohit
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Salinized rivers: degraded systems or new habitats for salt-tolerant faunas?

Authors:  Ben J Kefford; David Buchwalter; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jenny Davis; Richard P Duncan; Ary Hoffmann; Ross Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  A field-based characterization of conductivity in areas of minimal alteration: A case example in the Cascades of northwestern United States.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Gretchen Hayslip; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Field-based method for evaluating the annual maximum specific conductivity tolerated by freshwater invertebrates.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  A flow-chart for developing water quality criteria from two field-based methods.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Ryan A Hill; Rachael M Novak; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  A field-based model of the relationship between extirpation of salt-intolerant benthic invertebrates and background conductivity.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  The comparative osmoregulatory ability of two water beetle genera whose species span the fresh-hypersaline gradient in inland waters (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae).

Authors:  Susana Pallarés; Paula Arribas; David T Bilton; Andrés Millán; Josefa Velasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Global scale variation in the salinity sensitivity of riverine macroinvertebrates: eastern Australia, France, Israel and South Africa.

Authors:  Ben J Kefford; Graeme L Hickey; Avital Gasith; Elad Ben-David; Jason E Dunlop; Carolyn G Palmer; Kaylene Allan; Satish C Choy; Christophe Piscart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.