Literature DB >> 1501557

An analysis of supraspinatus EMG activity and shoulder isometric force development.

T W Worrell1, B J Corey, S L York, J Santiestaban.   

Abstract

Injury to the shoulder represents a significant disability to the athlete participating in throwing and other overhead sporting activities. There are few scientifically based rehabilitation protocols regarding the most efficient exercises for the rotator cuff musculature. There is contradiction concerning the most efficient position for supraspinatus muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity. Because the supraspinatus is the most frequently injured musculotendinous structure of the shoulder, the most efficient position for testing and rehabilitation of this structure should be identified. The purposes of this study were to compare two test positions for supraspinatus EMG activity and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force development of the shoulder. Twenty-two subjects performed MVIC in the two recommended testing positions. A paired t-test revealed the prone position produced significantly greater (P = 0.04) EMG activity than the standing test position. An additional paired t-test revealed the standing position produced significantly greater (P = 0.0001) force than the prone position. Since the supraspinatus EMG activity was lowest in the position that produced the greatest shoulder MVIC force, we hypothesize that muscle substitution occurred. We recommend the prone position for supraspinatus rehabilitation and testing.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1501557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

1.  Microinstability of the shoulder in the overhead athlete.

Authors:  Michael M Reinold; Alan S Curtis
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Rehabilitation of injuries in competitive swimmers.

Authors:  K A Kenal; L D Knapp
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Shoulder muscle activity and function in common shoulder rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Rafael F Escamilla; Kyle Yamashiro; Lonnie Paulos; James R Andrews
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The comparison of the empty can and full can techniques and a new diagonal horizontal adduction test for supraspinatus muscle testing using cross-sectional analysis through ultrasonography.

Authors:  Steven W Forbush; Douglas M White; Wayne Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-06

5.  Electromyographic analysis of the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles during 3 common rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Michael M Reinold; Leonard C Macrina; Kevin E Wilk; Glenn S Fleisig; Shouchen Dun; Steven W Barrentine; Michael T Ellerbusch; James R Andrews
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The role of the sensorimotor system in the athletic shoulder.

Authors:  J B Myers; S M Lephart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of the shoulder in overhead throwing athletes, part 2: injury prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Michael M Reinold; Thomas J Gill; Kevin E Wilk; James R Andrews
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Rehabilitation and Return to Play of the Athlete after an Upper Extremity Injury.

Authors:  Sameer R Oak; Brooks Klein; Neil N Verma; Benjamin Kerzner; Luc M Fortier; Neha S Chava; Michael M Reinold; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28

9.  Electromyographic Analysis of the Shoulder Girdle Musculature During External Rotation Exercises.

Authors:  Omid Alizadehkhaiyat; David H Hawkes; Graham J Kemp; Simon P Frostick
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.