Literature DB >> 15015531

Image formation in low-coherence and confocal interference microscopes.

Colin J R Sheppard1, Maitreyee Roy, Manjula D Sharma.   

Abstract

Image formation in the coherence probe microscope (CPM) and in optical coherence tomography (OCT) are compared. These systems differ in that CPM is a conventional interference microscope, but OCT is a confocal interference microscope. A major disadvantage of CPM for imaging through thick object structures is that there is no optical sectioning for the background image, which can saturate the detector. The behavior of the interference term in the presence of aberrations also exhibits some differences: Aberrations can be compensated in CPM, but not in OCT.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15015531     DOI: 10.1364/ao.43.001493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  2 in total

1.  Interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy.

Authors:  Tyler S Ralston; Daniel L Marks; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 20.034

2.  Reflectivity and topography of cells grown on glass-coverslips measured with phase-shifted laser feedback interference microscopy.

Authors:  Erdinç Atılgan; Ben Ovryn
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.732

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.