Literature DB >> 15015186

The UK Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: design, methodology and progress.

L C Brown1, D Epstein, A Manca, J D Beard, J T Powell, R M Greenhalgh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) trials aim to assess the efficacy of EVAR in the treatment of AAA in terms of mortality, quality of life, durability and cost-effectiveness.
DESIGN: Male and female patients aged at least 60 years with an AAA diameter measuring at least 5.5 cm on a computed tomography (CT) scan are assessed for anatomical suitability for EVAR. Suitable patients are offered entry either into EVAR Trial 1 if they are considered fit for conventional open repair or EVAR Trial 2 if they are considered unfit. EVAR 1 randomly allocates patients to EVAR or open repair and EVAR 2 randomly allocates patients to EVAR with best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone. Target recruitment for EVAR Trials 1 and 2 is 900 and 280 patients, respectively. PROGRESS: Recruitment began in September 1999 and there are currently 40 UK centres participating in the trials. Monthly targets are being exceeded in EVAR Trial 1 with 1037 patients randomised by October 2003. EVAR Trial 2 is also meeting monthly targets with a total of 319 patients randomised. When recruitment closes in December 2003 patients will need to be followed for at least 1 year from their operation. Publication of full results for both trials is expected in mid 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15015186     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  14 in total

1.  National screening programme for aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-08

2.  2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Thom W Rooke; Alan T Hirsch; Sanjay Misra; Anton N Sidawy; Joshua A Beckman; Laura K Findeiss; Jafar Golzarian; Heather L Gornik; Jonathan L Halperin; Michael R Jaff; Gregory L Moneta; Jeffrey W Olin; James C Stanley; Christopher J White; John V White; R Eugene Zierler
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Complications and reintervention following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 10-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  W K M Kieffer; S Sonnenberg; R A Windhaber; N Pal; R M Pemberton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Jennifer M Dehlin; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with peripheral artery disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Thom W Rooke; Alan T Hirsch; Sanjay Misra; Anton N Sidawy; Joshua A Beckman; Laura K Findeiss; Jafar Golzarian; Heather L Gornik; Jonathan L Halperin; Michael R Jaff; Gregory L Moneta; Jeffrey W Olin; James C Stanley; Christopher J White; John V White; R Eugene Zierler
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade.

Authors:  David C Brewster; John E Jones; Thomas K Chung; Glenn M Lamuraglia; Christopher J Kwolek; Michael T Watkins; Thomas M Hodgman; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Designation as "unfit for open repair" is associated with poor outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Randall R De Martino; Benjamin S Brooke; William Robinson; Andres Schanzer; Jeffrey E Indes; Jessica B Wallaert; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine K Giacovelli; Annetine Gelijns; Giampaolo Greco; Alan Moskowitz; James McKinsey; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair - Patient Selection and Long-term Outcome Expectations - Current Challenges in 2013.

Authors:  Regula S von Allmen; Florian Dick; Thomas R Wyss; Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.