Literature DB >> 1501467

Forensic drug testing for opiates. IV. Analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of commercial urine opiate immunoassays.

E J Cone1, S Dickerson, B D Paul, J M Mitchell.   

Abstract

Four commercial immunoassays, TDx Opiates (TDx), Coat-A-Count Morphine in Urine (CAC), Abuscreen Radioimmunoassay for Morphine (ABUS) and Emit d.a.u. Opiate Assay (EMIT), were tested for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with urine specimens containing known amounts of opiates and opiate metabolites. The immunoassays were evaluated in a semiquantitative mode by comparison of morphine equivalents to GC/MS assay of free and total morphine and codeine or to target concentrations. In all cases, the apparent sensitivities of the assays were higher than those required for detection of morphine at cutoffs mandated by the Health and Human Services guidelines for testing of Federal workers. The apparent specificities of the immunoassays varied considerably. The CAC assay was found to be highly selective for free morphine, whereas TDx, ABUS, and EMIT demonstrated broad cross-reactivity with other opiates. Comparison of semiquantitative results from the immunoassays with GC/MS data indicated a high degree of accuracy for determination of morphine levels. Generally, the patterns of sensitivity and cross-reactivity were unique for each assay, indicating that a detailed knowledge of assay performance characteristics is necessary for accurate interpretation of forensic urine testing data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1501467     DOI: 10.1093/jat/16.2.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users.

Authors:  D I Quinn; A Wodak; R O Day
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Urinary biomonitoring for alachlor exposure in commercial pesticide applicators by immunoassay.

Authors:  R E Biagini; W Tolos; W T Sanderson; G M Henningsen; B MacKenzie
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Evaluation of a method for simultaneous quantification of codeine, dihydrocodeine, morphine, and 6-monoacetylmorphine in serum, blood, and postmortem blood.

Authors:  F Musshoff; T Daldrup
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison.

Authors:  Mara A Karell; Helen K Langstaff; Demetrios J Halazonetis; Caterina Minghetti; Mélanie Frelat; Elena F Kranioti
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.686

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.