Literature DB >> 15014493

Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus' and Neptune's unusual magnetic fields.

Sabine Stanley1, Jeremy Bloxham.   

Abstract

The discovery of Uranus' and Neptune's non-dipolar, non-axisymmetric magnetic fields destroyed the picture--established by Earth, Jupiter and Saturn--that planetary magnetic fields are dominated by axial dipoles. Although various explanations for these unusual fields have been proposed, the cause of such field morphologies remains unexplained. Planetary magnetic fields are generated by complex fluid motions in electrically conducting regions of the planets (a process known as dynamo action), and so are intimately linked to the structure and evolution of planetary interiors. Determining why Uranus and Neptune have different field morphologies is not only critical for studying the interiors of these planets, but also essential for understanding the dynamics of magnetic-field generation in all planets. Here we present three-dimensional numerical dynamo simulations that model the dynamo source region as a convecting thin shell surrounding a stably stratified fluid interior. We show that this convective-region geometry produces magnetic fields similar in morphology to those of Uranus and Neptune. The fields are non-dipolar and non-axisymmetric, and result from a combination of the stable fluid's response to electromagnetic stress and the small length scales imposed by the thin shell.

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014493     DOI: 10.1038/nature02376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  12 in total

1.  Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars.

Authors:  Ulrich R Christensen; Volkmar Holzwarth; Ansgar Reiners
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fluid-like elastic response of superionic NH3 in Uranus and Neptune.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kimura; Motohiko Murakami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chemical processes in the deep interior of Uranus.

Authors:  Ricky Chau; Sebastien Hamel; William J Nellis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Mixtures of planetary ices at extreme conditions.

Authors:  Mal-Soon Lee; Sandro Scandolo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Neptune and Uranus: ice or rock giants?

Authors:  N A Teanby; P G J Irwin; J I Moses; R Helled
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The underexplored frontier of ice giant dynamos.

Authors:  K M Soderlund; S Stanley
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  In Search of Subsurface Oceans Within the Uranian Moons.

Authors:  C J Cochrane; S D Vance; T A Nordheim; M J Styczinski; A Masters; L H Regoli
Journal:  J Geophys Res Planets       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  The phase diagram of high-pressure superionic ice.

Authors:  Jiming Sun; Bryan K Clark; Salvatore Torquato; Roberto Car
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  When immiscible becomes miscible-Methane in water at high pressures.

Authors:  Ciprian G Pruteanu; Graeme J Ackland; Wilson C K Poon; John S Loveday
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Heat and charge transport in H2O at ice-giant conditions from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Federico Grasselli; Lars Stixrude; Stefano Baroni
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.