Literature DB >> 15014283

Prevalence, incidence, and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders during a 3-year follow-up study.

Leo A M Elders1, Alex Burdorf.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural history of low back pain by its prevalence, incidence, and recurrence during a 3-year period and identify risk factors for cumulative incidence and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although some studies have described prevalence, incidence, or recurrence of low back pain, few studies have assessed two or more of these outcome measures simultaneously. Furthermore, little is known about the association between individual, physical, psychosocial, and health-related risk factors and cumulative incidence and recurrence of low back pain in scaffolders.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, a cohort of 288 scaffolders (response 85%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at three yearly follow-ups during 3 years.
RESULTS: At baseline 60% of the study population had had an episode of low back pain in the past 12 months of which 22% was of chronic nature. During follow-up, the yearly incidence of low back pain varied between 20% and 28%, while yearly recurrence rates were 64% to 77%. Only few workers consistently reported the presence (20%) or absence (26%) of low back pain each year. Weak significant associations were present for the following: age 35 to 44 years, moderate general health, high strenuous arm movements, and body mass index with the cumulative incidence of low back pain. Significant associations were found between high manual handling of material and high job demand and low job control and the cumulative recurrence of low back pain, while moderate general health only showed a weak significant association with this outcome measure.
CONCLUSIONS: Low back pain was a dynamic process with high rates for incidence, recurrence, and recovery. General health and work-related physical and psychosocial factors influenced both the incidence and recurrence of low back pain. The incidence and recurrence of low back pain depend strongly on the recall period of low back pain and the time-window of investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014283     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000115125.60331.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

Review 1.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Early predictors of occupational back reinjury: results from a prospective study of workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Judith A Turner; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The role of physical workload and pain related fear in the development of low back pain in young workers: evidence from the BelCoBack Study; results after one year of follow up.

Authors:  A Van Nieuwenhuyse; P R Somville; G Crombez; A Burdorf; G Verbeke; K Johannik; O Van den Bergh; R Masschelein; Ph Mairiaux; G F Moens
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Physical activity and low back pain: a systematic review of recent literature.

Authors:  Hans Heneweer; Filip Staes; Geert Aufdemkampe; Machiel van Rijn; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review.

Authors:  Merel Wassenaar; Rogier M van Rijn; Maurits W van Tulder; Arianne P Verhagen; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Bart W Koes; Michiel R de Boer; Abida Z Ginai; Raymond W J G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pre-employment examination for low back risk in workers exposed to manual handling of loads: French guidelines.

Authors:  A Petit; S Rousseau; J F Huez; Ph Mairiaux; Y Roquelaure
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the construction industry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waleed Umer; Maxwell F Antwi-Afari; Heng Li; Grace P Y Szeto; Arnold Y L Wong
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Substantial sick-leave costs savings due to a graded activity intervention for workers with non-specific sub-acute low back pain.

Authors:  Hynek Hlobil; Kimi Uegaki; J Bart Staal; Martine C de Bruyne; Tjabe Smid; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Association of perceived physical overload at work with pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a 6-month longitudinal study.

Authors:  Samantha J Demarchi; Crystian B Oliveira; Marcia R Franco; Priscila K Morelhão; Thalysi M Hisamatsu; Fernanda G Silva; Tatiana M Damato; Rafael Z Pinto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  SPECTRUM OF SPINAL ABNORMALITIES ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL SUSPICION OF SPINAL LESIONS IN KANO, NIGERIA.

Authors:  M A Suwaid; A Ismail; M M Idris
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.