Literature DB >> 15014199

Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience.

D E Yocum1, D E Furst, W G Bensen, F X Burch, M A Borton, L J Mengle-Gaw, B D Schwartz, W Wisememandle, Q A Mekki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety of tacrolimus 3 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Patients with active RA who had discontinued all DMARDs for at least 2 weeks and had at least five tender/painful joints and three swollen joints, and required DMARD treatment in the opinion of the investigator, were enrolled into this open-label long-term safety trial. In addition, patients who had completed at least 3 months of treatment with tacrolimus 2 mg/day, tacrolimus 3 mg/day or placebo in a Phase III double-blind efficacy trial were allowed to roll over into this study. This latter group of patients did not have to fulfil any joint count requirements prior to entry into the long-term safety study, provided that no more than 14 days had elapsed between the end of their participation in the double-blind study and screening for the long-term safety study. All patients enrolled received tacrolimus 3 mg/day in addition to their current regimen of NSAIDs and corticosteroids.
RESULTS: 896 patients received at least one dose of tacrolimus 3 mg. The median duration of treatment was 359 days. 145 patients (16.2%) withdrew from the study for adverse events possibly or probably related to tacrolimus, 33 patients (3.7%) withdrew from the study for adverse events unrelated to tacrolimus and 112 (12.5%) withdrew for lack of efficacy. No adverse event with an incidence >0.7% appeared for the first time after the first 3 months of treatment with 3 mg tacrolimus. 529 patients (59%) experienced an adverse event that was possibly or probably related to tacrolimus; the most common were diarrhoea (14.6%), nausea (10.3%), tremor (9.0%), headache (8.7%), abdominal pain (7.9%), dyspepsia (7.6%), increased creatinine (6.8%) and hypertension (5.4%). Twenty-four patients (2.7%) experienced serious adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug; the most common were pneumonia (0.6%), hyperglycaemia (0.3%), gastroenteritis (0.2%), pancreatitis (0.2%) and diabetes mellitus (0.2%). The mean creatinine level increased from 67+/-19 micromol/l (0.76+/-0.22 mg/dl) at baseline to 75+/-26 micromol/l (0.85+/-0.30 mg/dl) (P<0.0001) at end of treatment. 351 (40.3%) of the 872 patients for whom creatinine levels were available at both baseline and during treatment had > or =30% increase from baseline in serum creatinine during the study, either related or unrelated to tacrolimus, with 73 patients (8.4%) having creatinine levels exceeding the normal range. At end of treatment, 177 patients (20.3%) had a > or =30% increase from baseline in creatinine. Serum creatinine remained within the normal range throughout the trial in approximately 90% of patients. At the end of treatment, the ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 38.4%, 18.6% and 9.0% respectively. Over 26% of patients had at least a 70% improvement in both swollen and painful/tender joints.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that tacrolimus was safe and well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit over a period of at least 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014199     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  20 in total

1.  Midterm clinico-radiologic findings of an open label observation study of add-on tacrolimus with biologics or non-biologic DMARDs.

Authors:  Yuya Takakubo; Yasunobu Tamaki; Tomoyuki Hirayama; Kiyoshi Iwazaki; Suran Yang; Akiko Sasaki; Haruki Nakano; Yrjö T Konttinen; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Strategies to modulate immune responses: a new frontier for gene therapy.

Authors:  Valder R Arruda; Patricia Favaro; Jonathan D Finn
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Efficacy of tacrolimus in infliximab-refractory progressive rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yokota; Yuji Akiyama; Yu Asanuma; Fumihiko Miyoshi; Kojiro Sato; Toshihide Mimura
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Shouma Dutta; Yasmeen Ahmad
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Emerging therapies offer new methods for treating rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Steve Russek
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2006-04

6.  Long-term therapeutic effects and safety of tacrolimus added to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Takeyuki Kanzaki; Kimito Kawahata; Hiroko Kanda; Keishi Fujio; Kanae Kubo; Lisa Akahira; Kazuya Michishita; Toshiki Eri; Kazuhiko Yamamoto
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 7.  New therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F Goldblatt; D A Isenberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  [Primary headaches and the influence of inflammatory diseases of the CNS and their respective immunmodulatory therapy].

Authors:  M Empl; A Straube
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Katsuya Suzuki; Hideto Kameda; Koichi Amano; Hayato Nagasawa; Hirofumi Takei; Naoya Sekiguchi; Eiko Nishi; Hiroe Ogawa; Kensei Tsuzaka; Tsutomu Takeuchi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Tacrolimus (FK506): Safety and Applications in Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas H Tung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.