PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of (18)F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine positron emission tomography (FLT-PET) for the detection and grading of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Nineteen patients with 20 STSs of the extremities were scanned, using attenuation corrected whole-body FLT-PET. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and tumor:nontumor ratios (TNTs) were compared with histopathological parameters using French and Japanese grading systems. RESULTS: Mean SUV, maximal SUV, and TNT could differentiate between low-grade (grade 1; n = 6) STS and high-grade (grade 2 and 3; n = 14) STS according to the French grading system (P = 0.001). Mean SUV, max SUV, and TNT correlated with mitotic score, MIB-1 score, the French and Japanese grading system (* = 0.550-0.747). CONCLUSIONS: FLT-PET is able to visualize STS and differentiate between low-grade and high-grade STS. The uptake of FLT correlates with the proliferation of STS.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of (18)F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine positron emission tomography (FLT-PET) for the detection and grading of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Nineteen patients with 20 STSs of the extremities were scanned, using attenuation corrected whole-body FLT-PET. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and tumor:nontumor ratios (TNTs) were compared with histopathological parameters using French and Japanese grading systems. RESULTS: Mean SUV, maximal SUV, and TNT could differentiate between low-grade (grade 1; n = 6) STS and high-grade (grade 2 and 3; n = 14) STS according to the French grading system (P = 0.001). Mean SUV, max SUV, and TNT correlated with mitotic score, MIB-1 score, the French and Japanese grading system (* = 0.550-0.747). CONCLUSIONS:FLT-PET is able to visualize STS and differentiate between low-grade and high-grade STS. The uptake of FLT correlates with the proliferation of STS.
Authors: Lukas B Been; Albert J H Suurmeijer; David C P Cobben; Pieter L Jager; Harald J Hoekstra; Philip H Elsinga Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Martin Hetzel; Holger Schirrmeister; Gisela Halter; Peter Möller; Clemens Kratochwil; Andreas Wahl; Gerhard Glatting; Felix M Mottaghy; Torsten Mattfeldt; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Charles M Laymon; Matthew J Oborski; Vincent K Lee; Denise K Davis; Erik C Wiener; Frank S Lieberman; Fernando E Boada; James M Mountz Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Nicolas Graf; Ken Herrmann; Barbara Numberger; Daniela Zwisler; Michaela Aichler; Annette Feuchtinger; Tibor Schuster; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Ulrich Keller; Tobias Dechow; Andreas K Buck Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yuka Yamamoto; Terence Z Wong; Timothy G Turkington; Thomas C Hawk; David A Reardon; R Edward Coleman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Nicolas Graf; Ken Herrmann; Jürgen den Hollander; Falko Fend; Tibor Schuster; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Dechow; Andreas K Buck Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Richard Laforest; Feng Gao; Kooresh I Shoghi; Rebecca L Aft; Brian Nussenbaum; Friederike H Kreisel; Nancy L Bartlett; Amanda Cashen; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Nina Wagner-Johnson; Robert H Mach Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 10.057