Literature DB >> 15014005

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor ketorolac as an oral rinse in oropharyngeal leukoplakia.

James L Mulshine1, Jane C Atkinson, Robert O Greer, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou, Carter Van Waes, Susan Rudy, Jack W Martin, Seth M Steinberg, David J Liewehr, Ingalill Avis, R Ilona Linnoila, Stephen Hewitt, Scott M Lippman, Robin Frye, Paul F Cavanaugh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors have been reported to decrease the frequency of upper aerodigestive cancers. Ketorolac tromethamine oral rinse has been shown to resolve another COX-dependent process, periodontal disease, without incurring gastrointestinal side effects. This trial evaluated if a topically delivered oral rinse containing ketorolac was as safe as and more effective than oral rinse alone in reducing the area of oral leukoplakia. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: 57 patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ketorolac (10 ml of a 0.1% ketorolac rinse solution; n = 38) or placebo (10 ml of rinse solution; n = 19) given twice daily for 30 s over 90 days. Primary end point was evaluated visually obtaining bidimensional measurement of the size of leukoplakia lesion(s) at entry and at 90 days. Secondary end point was histological assessment of the leukoplakia as sampled by serial punch biopsy and independently reviewed by three pathologists.
RESULTS: The patients included 67% males, 11% non-Caucasian, and 86% used tobacco with no significant differences between the two arms. Both rinses were well tolerated with good compliance, and there was no significant difference in adverse events (P = 0.27). Major response rate (complete response and partial response) was 30% for ketorolac and 32% for the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in change in histology between the two arms.
CONCLUSION: Local delivery of a COX-containing oral rinse was well tolerated but produced no significant reduction in the extent of leukoplakia compared with the placebo. However, the favorable response rate to placebo arm remains unexplained and additional investigation of the tissue penetration with ketorolac is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014005     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1020-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  20 in total

Review 1.  Chemoprevention of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through inhibition of NF-κB signaling.

Authors:  Robert Vander Broek; Grace E Snow; Zhong Chen; Carter Van Waes
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 2.  Cancer and inflammation: promise for biologic therapy.

Authors:  Sandra Demaria; Eli Pikarsky; Michael Karin; Lisa M Coussens; Yen-Ching Chen; Emad M El-Omar; Giorgio Trinchieri; Steven M Dubinett; Jenny T Mao; Eva Szabo; Arthur Krieg; George J Weiner; Bernard A Fox; George Coukos; Ena Wang; Robert T Abraham; Michele Carbone; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Oral premalignancy: new methods of detection and treatment.

Authors:  Ann Gillenwater; Vali Papadimitrakopoulou; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Oral dysplasia: biomarkers, treatment, and follow-up.

Authors:  Paul Nankivell; Hisham Mehanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Current and potential inflammation targeted therapies in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Frederick Wang; Pattatheyil Arun; Jay Friedman; Zhong Chen; Carter Van Waes
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  Distribution of anthocyanins delivered from a bioadhesive black raspberry gel following topical intraoral application in normal healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Carlos M Ugalde; Zhongfa Liu; Chen Ren; Kenneth K Chan; Kapila A Rodrigo; Yhonghua Ling; Peter E Larsen; Guillermo E Chacon; Gary D Stoner; Russell J Mumper; Henry W Fields; Susan R Mallery
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Prevention of Carcinogen-Induced Oral Cancer by Sulforaphane.

Authors:  Julie E Bauman; Yan Zang; Malabika Sen; Changyou Li; Lin Wang; Patricia A Egner; Jed W Fahey; Daniel P Normolle; Jennifer R Grandis; Thomas W Kensler; Daniel E Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 8.  Oral premalignancy: the roles of early detection and chemoprevention.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Foy; Chloé Bertolus; William N William; Pierre Saintigny
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Bowman birk inhibitor concentrate and oral leukoplakia: a randomized phase IIb trial.

Authors:  William B Armstrong; Thomas H Taylor; Ann R Kennedy; Raymond J Melrose; Diana V Messadi; Mai Gu; Anh D Le; Marjorie Perloff; Francisco Civantos; William Jarrard Goodwin; Lori J Wirth; Alexander Ross Kerr; Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-05

10.  Gene targets of sulforaphane in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lanlin Hu; Hua Li; Eliot D Lee; Jennifer R Grandis; Julie E Bauman; Daniel E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.