Literature DB >> 15013094

Dynamic loads are determinants of peak bone mass.

Kirsten C Moisio1, Debra E Hurwitz, Dale R Sumner.   

Abstract

This study investigated the association between non-invasive measurements of bone mass and markers of dynamic and static hip joint loads in subjects expected to be at peak bone mass. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of three proximal femoral sites (neck, greater trochanter, and total) were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the peak external joint moments at the hip during walking and jogging were calculated from gait analyses of 31 normal human subjects ranging in age from 30 to 49 years (18 females, 13 males). Various multiple regression analyses were performed to determine how much of the variance in BMD and BMC was explained by height, body mass, and the peak hip joint moments. In total, the models explained up to 40% of the variance in BMD and 58% of the variance in BMC. Inclusion of height or body mass did not increase the explanatory power of the models for BMD and explained no more than 8% of the total variance in BMC once the joint moments from walking were allowed to enter the models. These data support the hypothesis that variance in peak bone mass is associated with variance in dynamic hip loads largely independent of the effect of static factors such as height and body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15013094     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Relationships among body weight, joint moments generated during functional activities, and hip bone mass in older adults.

Authors:  Man-Ying Wang; Sean P Flanagan; Joo-Eun Song; Gail A Greendale; George J Salem
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter M Wayne; Julie E Buring; Roger B Davis; Ellen M Connors; Paolo Bonato; Benjamin Patritti; Mary Fischer; Gloria Y Yeh; Calvin J Cohen; Danette Carroll; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Assessment of the bone density of nomadic Fulani Herdsmen in northern Nigeria using calcaneal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Emmanuel P Laabes; Ayuba J Sendeht; Nyango D Dalyop; Robert H Glew
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-07-25

4.  Effects of age-related differences in femoral loading and bone mineral density on strains in the proximal femur during controlled walking.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Role of Nonbehavioral Factors in Adjusting Long Bone Diaphyseal Structure in Free-ranging Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  K J Carlson; D R Sumner; M E Morbeck; T Nishida; A Yamanaka; C Boesch
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Influence of basal energy expenditure and body composition on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Maria Aparecida Bezerra Quirino; João Modesto-Filho; Sancha Helena de Lima Vale; Camila Xavier Alves; Lúcia Dantas Leite; José Brandão-Neto
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-11-05

7.  Determinants of bone mass and bone size in a large cohort of physically active young adult men.

Authors:  J A Ruffing; F Cosman; M Zion; Susan Tendy; P Garrett; R Lindsay; J W Nieves
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.