Literature DB >> 15012771

Report of the Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Kwong Ming Fock1, Nick Talley, Richard Hunt, Ronnie Fass, Sanjay Nandurkar, Shiu-Kum Lam, Khean Lee Goh, Jose Sollano.   

Abstract

This report summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of a panel of gastroenterologists practising in the Asia-Pacific region. The group recognized that although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is less common and milder in endoscopic severity in Asia than in the West, there is nevertheless data to suggest an increasing frequency of the disease. During a 2-day workshop, the evidence for key issues in the diagnosis and clinical strategies for the management of the disease was evaluated, following which the recommendations were made and debated. The consensus report was presented at the Asia-Pacific Digestive Week 2003 in Singapore for ratification. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of erosive GERD. There is no gold standard for the diagnosis of non-erosive GERD (NERD). Diagnosis therefore relies on symptoms, a positive 24-h pH study or a response to a course of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The goals of treatment for GERD are to heal esophagitis, relieve symptoms, maintain the patient free of symptoms, improve quality of life and prevent complications. The PPI are the most effective medical treatment. Following initial treatment, on-demand therapy may be effective in some patients with NERD or mild (GI) erosive esophagitis. Anti-reflux surgery by a competent surgeon could achieve a similar outcome, although there is an operative mortality of 0.1-0.8%. The decision is dependent on the patient's preference and the availability of surgical expertise. Currently, endoscopic treatment should be performed only in the context of a clinical trial. Treatment of patients with typical GERD symptoms without alarm features in primary care could begin with PPI for 2 weeks followed by a further 4 weeks before going to on-demand therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15012771     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  22 in total

1.  Short-segment Barrett's esophagus and cardia intestinal metaplasia: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Ying Chang; Bin Liu; Gui-Sheng Liu; Tao Wang; Jun Gong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A comparison of the clinical, demographic and psychiatric profiles among patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease in a multi-ethnic Asian country.

Authors:  Tiing-Leong Ang; Kwong-Ming Fock; Tay-Meng Ng; Eng-Kiong Teo; Tju-Siang Chua; Jessica Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Proton pump inhibitor for non-erosive reflux disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Xiang Zhang; Meng-Yao Ji; Jia Song; Hong-Bo Lei; Shi Qiu; Jing Wang; Ming-Hua Ai; Jun Wang; Xiao-Guang Lv; Zi-Rong Yang; Wei-Guo Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Iwakiri; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Yasuki Habu; Tadayuki Oshima; Noriaki Manabe; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Akihito Nagahara; Osamu Kawamura; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Soji Ozawa; Kiyoshi Ashida; Shuichi Ohara; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Kyoichi Adachi; Kazuhide Higuchi; Hiroto Miwa; Kazuma Fujimoto; Motoyasu Kusano; Yoshio Hoshihara; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Ken Haruma; Michio Hongo; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Five common errors to avoid in clinical practice: the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Elisa Stasi; Andrea Michielan; Gaetano Cristian Morreale; Alessandro Tozzi; Ludovica Venezia; Francesco Bortoluzzi; Omero Triossi; Marco Soncini; Gioacchino Leandro; Giuseppe Milazzo; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Kwong Ming Fock; Choo Hean Poh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Presence of minimal change esophagitis closely correlates with pathological conditions in the stomach.

Authors:  Tomomitsu Tahara; Tomoyuki Shibata; Masakatsu Nakamura; Joh Yonemura; Masaaki Okubo; Daisuke Yoshioka; Yoshio Kamiya; Tomiyasu Arisawa; Ichiro Hirata
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Relationship of the frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease with endoscopic findings of cardiac sphincter morphology.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Investigation of relationships among gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes using narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Dong Liu; Shi-Yang Ma; Jun Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; George Karamanolis; Paul Patapis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.