Literature DB >> 15012639

Living with a terminal illness: patients' priorities.

Helen Carter1, Rod MacLeod, Penny Brander, Kath McPherson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of terminal illness and its consequences has been predominantly based on models derived from expert definition, rather than the patient's perspective. More recently, quality of life tools have been developed to enable patient choice in responses. However, an even broader approach may be needed to help identify goals for care for patients who are terminally ill. AIM: The aim of this paper is to report on an exploratory, qualitative study exploring what people living with terminal illness considered were the areas of priority in their lives.
METHODS: Ten people living with terminal cancer were interviewed. Analysis of the interviews incorporated principles of narrative analysis and grounded theory.
FINDINGS: Over 30 categories were identified and collated into five inter-related themes (personal/intrinsic factors, external/extrinsic factors, future issues, perceptions of normality and taking charge) encompassing the issues of importance to all participants. Each theme focused on 'life and living' in relation to life as it was or would be without illness. Practical issues of daily living and the opportunity to address philosophical issues around the meaning of life emerged as important areas. The central theme, 'taking charge', concerned with people's levels of life engagement, was integrally connected to all other themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the way in which health professionals manage patients' involvement in matters such as symptom relief can impact on existential areas of concern. Understanding patients' perspectives in relation to each theme may assist health professionals to develop management strategies appropriate to their needs. The findings challenge some aspects of traditional 'expert-defined' outcome measures. As this was an exploratory study, further work is needed to test and develop the model presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15012639     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02953.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  Religious coping is associated with the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Nalini Tarakeshwar; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Elizabeth Paulk; Michelle J Pearce; Stanislav V Kasl; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  A concept analysis of the existential experience of adults with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Elise C Tarbi; Salimah H Meghani
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Exploring symptom meaning: perspectives of palliative care physicians.

Authors:  Celina F Estacio; Phyllis N Butow; Melanie R Lovell; Skye T Dong; Josephine M Clayton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Psychosocial determinants of physicians' intention to practice euthanasia in palliative care.

Authors:  Mireille Lavoie; Gaston Godin; Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im; Danielle Blondeau; Isabelle Martineau; Louis Roy
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  The 'Cancer Home-Life Intervention': A randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an occupational therapy-based intervention in people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Marc Sampedro Pilegaard; Karen la Cour; Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard; Anna Thit Johnsen; Line Lindahl-Jacobsen; Inger Højris; Åse Brandt
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Conceptual framework for living with and beyond cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Clair Le Boutillier; Stephanie Archer; Claire Barry; Alex King; Louise Mansfield; Catherine Urch
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Development of an international Core Outcome Set (COS) for best care for the dying person: study protocol.

Authors:  Sofia C Zambrano; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Agnes van der Heide; Vilma A Tripodoro; John Ellershaw; Carl Johan Fürst; Raymond Voltz; Stephen Mason; María L Daud; Gustavo De Simone; Kerstin Kremeike; Svandis Iris Halfdanardottir; Valgerdur Sigurdardottir; Jeremy Johnson; Simon Allan; Haroon Hafeez; Catarina Simões; Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir; Birgit H Rasmussen; Paula Williamson; Steffen Eychmüller
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.234

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.