Literature DB >> 15012581

Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical guidelines: are there any "magic bullets"?

Martin P Eccles1, Jeremy M Grimshaw.   

Abstract

There are internationally agreed optimal methods for developing clinical practice guidelines. The quality of published guidelines varies. A validated assessment instrument should be used to identify well developed guidelines that can be used with confidence. There are multiple ways of presenting guidelines, including computerised systems. Computerisation of guidelines can cover a range of formats, from brief prompts through to complex decision-support systems. Integrating guidelines into computerised reminder systems has been shown to be effective in improving patient care, but there is less evidence to support the effectiveness of guidelines integrated into computerised decision-support systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15012581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  20 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.

Authors:  N Bruce Baskerville; Clare Liddy; William Hogg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Family physicians' perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation.

Authors:  Annemie Heselmans; Bert Aertgeerts; Peter Donceel; Siegfried Geens; Stijn Van de Velde; Dirk Ramaekers
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Models, strategies, and tools. Theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice.

Authors:  Anne Sales; Jeffrey Smith; Geoffrey Curran; Laura Kochevar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Lessons learned in implementing evidence-based practices: implications for psychiatric administrators.

Authors:  Richard M Bloch; Sy Atezaz Saeed; Jeanne C Rivard; Christina Rausch
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Claire Glenton; Catherine Pope
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Using theory to predict implementation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention within a practice-based research network.

Authors:  David E Demik; Mark W Vander Weg; Emily S Lundt; Christopher S Coffey; Gail Ardery; Barry L Carter
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-03-16

7.  Management of rectal cancer in Canada: an evidence-based comparison of clinical practice guidelines

Authors:  Zuhaib M. Mir; David Yu; Shaila J. Merchant; Christopher M. Booth; Sunil V. Patel
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Pharmaco-management of inhalation injuries for burn survivors.

Authors:  Anthony C Bartley; Dale W Edgar; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  The QICKD study protocol: a cluster randomised trial to compare quality improvement interventions to lower systolic BP in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care.

Authors:  Simon de Lusignan; Hugh Gallagher; Tom Chan; Nicki Thomas; Jeremy van Vlymen; Michael Nation; Neerja Jain; Aumran Tahir; Elizabeth du Bois; Iain Crinson; Nigel Hague; Fiona Reid; Kevin Harris
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settings - a systematic review.

Authors:  Annemie Heselmans; Stijn Van de Velde; Peter Donceel; Bert Aertgeerts; Dirk Ramaekers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.