Literature DB >> 15012571

7: Treatment of osteoporosis: why, whom, when and how to treat. The single most important consideration is the individual's absolute risk of fracture.

Ego Seeman1, John A Eisman.   

Abstract

All women and men with a history of fragility fractures should be considered for treatment of osteoporosis to reduce their risk of future fracture. There is high-level evidence for the anti-fracture efficacy of treatment in women with osteoporosis, particularly if there is prevalent fracture; the evidence is less compelling for women with osteopenia, with or without a fracture, and for men. The rigorously investigated drugs reported to reduce vertebral fractures are the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate, the selective oestrogen-receptor modulator raloxifene, the anabolic agent parathyroid hormone and, most recently, strontium ranelate. Only the two bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been reported to reduce hip fractures in community-dwelling women, and calcium plus vitamin D and hip protectors have been reported to reduce these fractures in elderly people in institutions. HRT is not recommended in women for fracture risk reduction alone. Evidence for the anti-fracture efficacy of calcitonin, fluoride, anabolic steroids and active vitamin D metabolites is insufficient to justify their use; lifestyle changes, while not shown to reduce fracture risk, may have a role in maintaining bone strength throughout life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15012571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  19 in total

Review 1.  Time to onset of efficacy in fracture reduction with current anti-osteoporosis treatments.

Authors:  Charles A Inderjeeth; Kien Chan; Kevin Kwan; Michelle Lai
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  An update on biomarkers of bone turnover and their utility in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Authors:  D J Leeming; P Alexandersen; M A Karsdal; P Qvist; S Schaller; L B Tankó
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Individualization of osteoporosis risk.

Authors:  T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone health and back pain: what do we know and where should we go?

Authors:  A M Briggs; L M Straker; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Patterns of treatment in Australian men following fracture.

Authors:  R Otmar; M J Henry; M A Kotowicz; G C Nicholson; S Korn; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Significance of osteoporosis in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; R Schmelzeisen; B M Pfeiffer; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on periodontal disease in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pouran Famili; Jane A Cauley; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Nutritional approach for inhibiting bone resorption in institutionalized elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency and high prevalence of fracture.

Authors:  J-P Bonjour; V Benoit; O Pourchaire; B Rousseau; J-C Souberbielle
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  [Metabolic bone diseases].

Authors:  F Jakob
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Drug Insight: choosing a drug treatment strategy for women with osteoporosis-an evidence--based clinical perspective.

Authors:  Piet P Geusens; Christian H Roux; David M Reid; Willem F Lems; Silvano Adami; Jonathan D Adachi; Philip N Sambrook; Kenneth G Saag; Nancy E Lane; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2008-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.