Literature DB >> 15012506

Programmed cell death in plant disease: the purpose and promise of cellular suicide.

D G Gilchrist1.   

Abstract

The interaction of pathogens with plants leads to a disruption in cellular homeostasis, often leading to cell death, in both compatible and incompatible relationships. The mechanistic basis of this cellular disruption and consequent death is complex and poorly characterized, but it is established that host responses to pathogens are dependent on gene expression, involve signal transduction, and require energy. Recent data suggest that in animals, a genetically regulated, signal transduction-dependent programmed cell death process, commonly referred to as apoptosis, is conserved over a wide range of phyla. The basic function of apoptosis is to direct the selective elimination of certain cells during development, but it also is a master template that is involved in host responses to many pathogens. Programmed cell death in plants, while widely observed, has not been studied extensively at either the biochemical or genetic level. Current data suggest that activation or suppression of programmed cell death may underlie diseases in plants as it does in animals. This review describes some of the fundamental characteristics of apoptosis in animals and points to a number of connections to programmed cell death in plants that may lead to both a better understanding of disease processes and novel strategies for engineering disease resistance in plants.

Year:  1998        PMID: 15012506     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol        ISSN: 0066-4286            Impact factor:   13.078


  43 in total

1.  Bax-induced cell death in tobacco is similar to the hypersensitive response.

Authors:  C Lacomme; S Santa Cruz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Resistance and susceptibility of plants to fungal pathogens.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Toyoda; Nicholas C Collins; Akira Takahashi; Ken Shirasu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family of transcription factors in tomato.

Authors:  María Salinas; Shuping Xing; Susanne Höhmann; Rita Berndtgen; Peter Huijser
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  MdUGT88F1-Mediated Phloridzin Biosynthesis Regulates Apple Development and Valsa Canker Resistance.

Authors:  Kun Zhou; Lingyu Hu; Yangtiansu Li; Xiaofeng Chen; Zhijun Zhang; Bingbing Liu; Pengmin Li; Xiaoqing Gong; Fengwang Ma
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Structural and phylogenetic analysis of Pto-type disease resistance gene candidates in banana.

Authors:  Santy Peraza-Echeverria; Andrew James-Kay; Blondy Canto-Canché; Eduardo Castillo-Castro
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  A circadian rhythm-regulated tomato gene is induced by Arachidonic acid and Phythophthora infestans infection.

Authors:  Philip D Weyman; Zhiqiang Pan; Qin Feng; David G Gilchrist; Richard M Bostock
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  The role of vacuole in plant cell death.

Authors:  I Hara-Nishimura; N Hatsugai
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 8.  Two vacuole-mediated defense strategies in plants.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hatsugai; Ikuko Hara-Nishimura
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12

9.  Expression of the antiapoptotic baculovirus p35 gene in tomato blocks programmed cell death and provides broad-spectrum resistance to disease.

Authors:  James E Lincoln; Craig Richael; Bert Overduin; Kathy Smith; Richard Bostock; David G Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Transcriptomic analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) endosperm using the RNA-Seq technique.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Hong Xu; Yanyue Shen; Jianbo Wang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.