Literature DB >> 15012381

Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology.

K R Hopper1.   

Abstract

In evolutionary ecology, risk-spreading (i.e. bet-hedging) is the idea that unpredictably variable environments favor genotypes with lower variance in fitness at the cost of lower arithmetic mean fitness. Variance in fitness can be reduced by physiology or behavior that spreads risk of encountering an unfavorable environment over time or space. Such risk-spreading can be achieved by a single phenotype that avoids risks (conservative risk-spreading) or by phenotypic variation expressed by a single genotype (diversified risk-spreading). Across these categories, three types of risk-spreading can be usefully distinguished: temporal, metapopulation, and within-generation. Theory suggests that temporal and metapopulation risk-spreading may work under a broad range of population sizes, but within-generation risk-spreading appears to work only when populations are small. Although genetic polymorphisms have sometimes been treated as risk-spreading, the underlying mechanisms are different, and they often require different conditions for their evolution and thus are better treated separately. I review the types of evidence that could be used to test for risk-spreading and discuss evidence for risk-spreading in facultative diapause, migration polyphenism, spatial distribution of oviposition, egg size, and other miscellaneous traits. Although risk-spreading theory is voluminous and well developed in some ways, rarely has it been used to generate detailed, testable hypotheses about the evolution of risk-spreading. Furthermore, although there is evidence for risk-spreading, particularly in facultative diapause, I have been unable to find any definitive tests with unequivocal results showing that risk-spreading has been a major factor in the evolution of insect behaviors or life histories. To advance our understanding of risk-spreading in the wild, we need (a) explicit empirical models that predict levels of diversifying risk-spreading for several insect populations in several environments that vary in uncertainty, and (b) tests of these models using measurements of phenotypes and their fitnesses over several generations in each environment.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15012381     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN: 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  59 in total

1.  Diverse Allyl Glucosinolate Catabolites Independently Influence Root Growth and Development.

Authors:  Ella Katz; Rammyani Bagchi; Verena Jeschke; Alycia R M Rasmussen; Aleshia Hopper; Meike Burow; Mark Estelle; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Are bottlenecks associated with colonization? Genetic diversity and diapause variation of native and introduced Rhagoletis completa populations.

Authors:  Yolanda H Chen; Susan B Opp; Stewart H Berlocher; George K Roderick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Evolution of aquatic insect behaviours across a gradient of disturbance predictability.

Authors:  David A Lytle; Michael T Bogan; Debra S Finn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fitness consequences of host use in the field: temporal variation in performance and a life history tradeoff in the moth Rothschildia lebeau (Saturniidae).

Authors:  Salvatore J Agosta
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The influence of pool volume and summer desiccation on the production of the resting and dispersal stage in a Daphnia metapopulation.

Authors:  Florian Altermatt; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging.

Authors:  Andrew M Simons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Intragenomic bet-hedging.

Authors:  Jostein Starrfelt
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis; Aurelio José Figueredo; Barbara H Brumbach; Gabriel L Schlomer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2009-06

9.  Cold winter temperatures condition the egg-hatching dynamics of a grape disease vector.

Authors:  Julien Chuche; Denis Thiéry
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-04-29

10.  Reduced-risk management of Rhagoletis cerasi flies (host race Prunus) in combination with a preliminary phenological model.

Authors:  O B Kovanci; B Kovanci
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.